Secondary Entrance

[RiZeN_LinK]

this is not a bug but a rule writing conflict therefore leading to "harsh but nonsensical bug signals"
With all respect, you just made up words following the last sentence of this action card.

This should be stipulated on the card, it is a subtlety causing conflicts. In all card games, the subtleties are written on the playing cards

You should not create a bug report but a rewriting report of the playing card

[greenjacket124]

this is not a bug but a rule writing conflict therefore leading to "harsh but nonsensical bug signals"
With all respect, you just made up words following the last sentence of this action card.

This should be stipulated on the card, it is a subtlety causing conflicts. In all card games, the subtleties are written on the playing cards

You should not create a bug report but a rewriting report of the playing card

Don't know what to tell you, bud. There's nothing wrong in the wording of the card, and we don't work for the publisher to change the actual card. If English is not your native language and this is a potential translation issue, translations are handled by the community. You can go to Community > Translation in the top bar of the website to suggest or make updates.

[RiZeN_LinK]

I'm French, nice to meet you!

There could be a translation error going as far as the written rules of the game itself, in this case

But marking this subtlety on the card (as in all self-respecting card games) would change everything.
Avoid a player accidentally playing in the wrong order without possible going back to the Bga version. except, in real life a remake of the miss of the first rounds of the players is doable without much problem