Board Game Arena

jgpaladin wrote: ↑20 July 2023, 05:19 I don't care if you aren't good at Hanabi as long as I am not stuck playing with you.

Reasonable, as long as you don't expect me to go out of my way to make sure my ELO is a good representation of my skill level when measuring Hanabi skill isn't what ELO is for.

It is, but assigning a rating to a "puzzle to solve", in this case an Hanabi game, and treating the game as a humans vs Hanabi match will make it work just as well for cooperative games. The solution to the puzzle is to play games with a friend and cheat, which is why ELO isn't useful for...

Nobody cares if you don’t become good at Hanabi. All players want is for Hanabi ELO to (at least roughly) reflect skill with Hanabi, to allow us to choose not to play with unskilled players (or, alternatively, with highly skilled players - some players have said they prefer not to play with masters...

What is the obsession with forcing people to become good at Hanabi? None of us are getting paid to be here.

A high ELO simply tells you that the player will not play with new players. It is otherwise not very useful when describing someone's level of Hanabi skill.

If everyone at the table is giving you red thumbs, then the problem is you.

Warum sollten Sie auf einen deutschen Beitrag auf Englisch antworten?

Tell me how this is not suspicious for instance. 0 elo player with 1100+ elo player. And there are several games in a row like this. (If it goes against some kind of forum rules, you can tell me to delete this) https://boardgamearena.com/archive/replay/230628-1001/?table=392646429&player=838242...