Board Game Arena

While the suggested idea has also some drawbacks, I think it’s the simplest idea to improve the current system. People may be discouraged to continue playing when they fall behind their personal best, but that is a personal choice. When the top players at a ridiculously high score like 2200 continue...

Yeah I second this. Find it rude to concede last turn. Do it until 90%, but not literally the turn before the end

Totally agree, that’s a very good point. When upgraded last, asso might give more points if the donations are still up for grabs!

why would it need a buff? it's already the strongest upgraded action in 2p games I thought it’s the one getting the fewest upgrades, I wasn’t aware that this changed? That’s why I started thinking what could make people choose it more frequently over eg association. it's 42% by top players. 67% amo...

Changes should only be made to address something specific. What perceived issue with upgraded sponsors are you trying to fix? The idea was rather to create more even ratios of how frequently the action cards are upgraded, enabling slightly different strategic avenues. Sponsors are with approx 0.3 u...

JDansp wrote: ↑24 May 2024, 13:09 why would it need a buff? it's already the strongest upgraded action in 2p games

I thought it’s the one getting the fewest upgrades, I wasn’t aware that this changed? That’s why I started thinking what could make people choose it more frequently over eg association.

Just hypothetically, how would you like if upgraded Sponsors would be slightly buffed, in the way that excess value (e.g., playing a 4er valued card on 5) breaks the differences & 2 money/difference? I'm aware that no one will change the rules and Marine Worlds already adds some extras with draf...