Board Game Arena

The argument "no one is willing to play 2p in arena, therefore we shouldn't go to a higher player count" seems spurious to me: the 2p game plays very differently (and IMO much worse) than the multiplayer game, so I would not opt to play arena with those options. I'm glad arena's 3p now, an...

Congrats, ufm, for all your games getting un-betaed.

That's baffling--there's tons of games which have teammates at some but not all options/player counts. GL!

Then don't set the teammate flag in 3p mode? That seems like it should be possible if implementation wasn't botched on BGA's side. Certainly there has to be some way to set it differently for different player counts. Frankly, no one seems to play 3p. For me, if it's one or the other, I'd rather have...

None of those conditions seem to apply? (Unless there's some weird non-partner option.) 2v2 is exactly the situation where it *should* be applied.

Despite the bug report, it's clearly possible to neutralise ranking points between teammates: nanatoridori does this properly. Euchre has a closed bug report claiming it's not.

I think the upshot is that developer studio is poorly documented.

It is not at all clear from the interface that this order is the order they're put back, nor indeed which end of the row is on top after doing so.

AIUI you can only generate "virtual" marbles with converters, not real ones. You can't just randomly make marbles of "off colours" as a result"; it's never required to (optimally) use up your existing energy.