Search found 8 matches

by DressToKILT
22 April 2020, 11:47
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Restricting chat to premium
Replies: 30
Views: 15595

Re: Restricting chat to premium

N_Faker wrote: 21 April 2020, 19:08 You should be able to select the thumb you wish to apply there.
I am fully aware of how this works, and as I stated, this was not an option.
by DressToKILT
21 April 2020, 18:48
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Number of quits since quarantine
Replies: 3
Views: 876

Re: Number of quits since quarantine

Jest Phulin wrote: 20 April 2020, 02:20 Set the reputation filter to 85% when creating a table, thus excluding beginners if you don't like beginner's behavior.
Yeah, I've been doing this for years. Play a few games to prove that you can handle the site, then I will play with you.
by DressToKILT
21 April 2020, 18:43
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Restricting chat to premium
Replies: 30
Views: 15595

Re: Restricting chat to premium

I'm assuming you are referring to public red thumbs, they can only be applied if you played a game with them or received a private message from them within a certain timeframe. I did. The "conversation," as it were, happened in the chat of a game. Afterward, I was not given the option to ...
by DressToKILT
19 April 2020, 12:45
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Restricting chat to premium
Replies: 30
Views: 15595

Re: Restricting chat to premium

So they defamed a news source? Not someone, a person, on BGA? You say that they spread "dangerous disinformation". Where? Considering how you claim it defames a news source and that it had an effect on the public at large, I would expect it to be quite prevalent on BGA. This person was, w...
by DressToKILT
19 April 2020, 02:02
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Restricting chat to premium
Replies: 30
Views: 15595

Re: Restricting chat to premium

Who was the target of the defamation? What and where was it said? It must be quite extensive to have affected the public order or morality. They were defaming legitimate news sources and spreading dangerous disinformation during a global pandemic. I seriously don't understand how anyone still fails...
by DressToKILT
18 April 2020, 22:45
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Restricting chat to premium
Replies: 30
Views: 15595

Re: Restricting chat to premium

N_Faker wrote: 18 April 2020, 21:53 What portion of the ToS were they violating?
Being an apologist for crimes or contain illegal messages, threatening, or pedophile nature, pornographic, defamatory, obscene, hateful, racist, antisemitic, xenophobic, revisionist or contrary to public order or morality;
by DressToKILT
18 April 2020, 17:35
Forum: Discussions
Topic: Restricting chat to premium
Replies: 30
Views: 15595

Re: Restricting chat to premium

This is kind of funny considering this site blatantly refused to take any action against a player who was peddling dangerous disinformation about the current pandemic, claiming that it "didn't violate the TOS" (spoiler alert: it does).
by DressToKILT
09 June 2019, 15:26
Forum: Suggestions
Topic: Inviting players to match
Replies: 4
Views: 1750

Re: Inviting players to match

Personally I would rather see the list filtered to the settings for the table. If I set the table to Good players and above and 75% reputation or higher, why is the list showing me apprentices? Why do I get a 5-second suggestion penalty for clicking on a player with a 60% reputation when I can't eve...

Go to advanced search