Board Game Arena

That was by far, the most satisfying answer ever!

I totally misinterpreted the numbers. So i stand corrected!
I apologize.

Please? You are pulling the card of me being just unreasonable and wrong. You want to make your point by calling numbers. But you only use what is in favour of your own idea. Just played another "low" posibility game of the 7 doubles on 23 for one of both parties. I dont want more discussi...

Take also the opponents when you take those of me

correct, but not almost everygame.

Soit, doesnt matter. It seems normal, so as suggested, play or not to play

I know that this is a comon topic. But if you look at the stats ... look at the numbers. It's just not adding up anymore!

Yet another game 18 - 5 doubles.

In all cases i have in mind alot 6's.

Why bother showing stats, if you cant at least mention the weird behaviours against the odds!

Last game i played 23 thows .. 7 doubles. A 5.46% rate.
These rates are more often then not in one of both players. It determins the win in alot of the games.

Sorry, but if you call this a good algorithm, you never played backgammon with real dice!

FIX

I guess your random seed algorithm just fails!

You are 100% correct!
I missed this somehow looking at the tutorial ( ), but that's pretty clear.
Thank you!

Can someone explain to me how the game determines the play order in this game?

Selecting a tile first is a BIG win criteria and last game played, only had to do it 1 time!

Probably i'm missing something here, or is it bug?

aesche wrote: ↑15 May 2020, 23:44 Most current example where this is discussed: https://boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=40649
One noisy guy spamming „claims“ for a rigged system, while in fact it all isn‘t even rare statistical events. Dont follow the same path please.

I won't follow the same path ... i have my answer