Coup

Board Game Arena Official announcements
User avatar
asd123321
Posts: 233
Joined: 24 November 2013, 00:02

Re: Coup

Post by asd123321 »

The time estimate is way low. with 5 players and getting to 3 wins could be 2 hours
User avatar
xxerox
Posts: 172
Joined: 06 October 2014, 01:11

Re: Coup

Post by xxerox »

So broken right now.

It should be losing players in the order they lose like in perudo, so they can actually quit the game.

P.S.For those of you who want the turn system removed:

The game is online on a mobile app completely free.

It works there and is fun.

So stop complaining.

P.S.S. Celestia as a fun and underrated game.
User avatar
vigorousRoll
Posts: 84
Joined: 17 February 2018, 09:46

Re: Coup

Post by vigorousRoll »

Add my "+1" to those hoping a turn-based option will be coming along someday.
User avatar
78mahdi78davari78
Posts: 3
Joined: 12 October 2018, 09:18

Re: Coup

Post by 78mahdi78davari78 »

thank BGA for release coup and I will hope I see MOST WANTED GAMES soon :D
User avatar
Michielos
Posts: 14
Joined: 07 July 2018, 18:43

Re: Coup

Post by Michielos »

sourisdudesert wrote:
Michielos wrote:Unfortunately its full of bugs and rule errors :(
We indeed have an important bug on ambassador during the launch but it has been fixed immediately and there are zero open bugs right now ;)
Thats not the only thing, it also has a rule error:

A) player A used captain to steal from player B
B) Player C didnt believe player A and wanted to call player A's bluff
C) Player A showed a captain
D) Player A stole 2 coins from player B

however, player B had a captain. Even if he didnt had a captain, he would surely have the right to bluff one to counter losing 2 coins.

That is not what happened, player B didnt had a chance to do anything and just lost 2 coins?
Thats what i call a rule error or?
truecolors
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 November 2018, 02:06

Re: Coup

Post by truecolors »

I have another rules question about the Captain. Under BGA's implementation, this is how this interaction goes:

1. Player A has a captain and steals from player B, who has only one card and $2+.
2. Player B challenges the captain and is shown to be wrong.
3. Player B loses his last card of the round and goes to $0.
4. Player A gets no money.

To me, it seems like Player A should still get $2, since they correctly stole from someone who couldn't block, but that's not how BGA does it.
User avatar
JCase16
Posts: 116
Joined: 26 June 2015, 19:07

Re: Coup

Post by JCase16 »

truecolors wrote:I have another rules question about the Captain. Under BGA's implementation, this is how this interaction goes:

1. Player A has a captain and steals from player B, who has only one card and $2+.
2. Player B challenges the captain and is shown to be wrong.
3. Player B loses his last card of the round and goes to $0.
4. Player A gets no money.

To me, it seems like Player A should still get $2, since they correctly stole from someone who couldn't block, but that's not how BGA does it.
Yeah that's a bug
User avatar
Michielos
Posts: 14
Joined: 07 July 2018, 18:43

Re: Coup

Post by Michielos »

That one happened to me too today. It isnt playable at this moment because of some rules error and bugs but this is a great addition. Also i like the old art :D
User avatar
RicardoRix
Posts: 2117
Joined: 29 April 2012, 23:43

Re: Coup

Post by RicardoRix »

The Ambassador can also block stealing. Are you taking that into account?

According the game rules, challenges are immediately resolved and then the result of action. So looks like BGA is right.
User avatar
JCase16
Posts: 116
Joined: 26 June 2015, 19:07

Re: Coup

Post by JCase16 »

Wait what? No, the person being stolen from gets to block. This is not a challenge. You can challenge that player A has a captain to steal, and then you can challenge whether player B has a captain or ambassador to block. They are two separate challenges.
Locked

Return to “Official announcements [en]”