Thanks for the info. Is number of participants also the criteria used to determine the xp award? And while those cutoffs aren't unreasonable, I can see some value in loosening up on them a bit. Something like 30 / 100 / 200 keeps you in the top 5-10% range for people getting trophies (versus going as low as 2% if you finish with just under 500 people). Since lower rank trophies for smaller games give a lot less xp anyway it doesn't seem like a big deal in the grand scheme of things and may encourage more people to try those game.sourisdudesert wrote: ↑16 April 2020, 22:17Yes, we didn't award top 5 / top 10 / top 20 awards for games with less than 50 / 200 / 500 participants in the Arena.
However this should have worked for top 5 Clans of Caledonia.
We are investigating...
Is it feasible to only list players who have played at least one game in the rankings, right now it is impossible to tell how many players have played games when the spots are filled with bronze 1's?