Please remove random memory
Posted: 18 October 2017, 19:33
I dont know why there should be a random memory. Just let the first two "real" memories battle Each other.
Everyone could have multiple votes to give to their favored memory, ties should then lead to another vote to determine the best between the tied memories until one remains. It certainly would make it more cumbersome, and maybe not that fun anymore, so eh. I do think the current system could be improved upon though. In what way that also preserves the games flow and ease of use, I do not know.FourGiving wrote:The problems with multiple sentences at once are many. More components to keep track of, especially in the real life version. But especially that you'd need lots of voting cards, knowing who had what sentence, and you'd still end up with ties. For example, in a six player game, what if 3 players got 2 votes each? It just gets more cumbersome than a simple party game should be.
That sounds horrible. I vote for tossing it out the window.FourGiving wrote:The other option, which SEEMS to have merit, is to award a sentence points for each turn it wins the vote. But then this totally stinks for those players going last It could also lead to some "gamey" votes, where someone is voting against a sentence only because they don't want that person to get anymore points.