Every single wonder is better on side B, so why do we even need to make the decision to pick which side? It makes the game just a clicking exercise, not a test of decision making.
Can we get a small boost to every Wonder A side? For example you get 1 or 2 extra coin when you choose side A. Just a small boost to try and make the game more rich and balanced.
Furthermore, Olympia literally is the worst wonder. The effects are never worth their cost, so you have to pray people realize you have a terrible wonder and throw all their coins at you.
Olympia needs a complete re-work. Just take it out of the game until there can be something that's balanced.
Lastly, Hali B is too good. The Mausoleum wonder is very cheap costing and you can always find a reasonable card, plus the extra couple VP it provides. It gives the player too much flexibility.
change: move the VPs on the wonder so its 0,1,2 intead of the 2,1,0 it is currently so people can't just build it and automatically gain the higher amount first.
If you agree can I get an Amen?
If you disagree give good reasons why.
Can we get a small boost to every Wonder A side? For example you get 1 or 2 extra coin when you choose side A. Just a small boost to try and make the game more rich and balanced.
Furthermore, Olympia literally is the worst wonder. The effects are never worth their cost, so you have to pray people realize you have a terrible wonder and throw all their coins at you.
Olympia needs a complete re-work. Just take it out of the game until there can be something that's balanced.
Lastly, Hali B is too good. The Mausoleum wonder is very cheap costing and you can always find a reasonable card, plus the extra couple VP it provides. It gives the player too much flexibility.
change: move the VPs on the wonder so its 0,1,2 intead of the 2,1,0 it is currently so people can't just build it and automatically gain the higher amount first.
If you agree can I get an Amen?
If you disagree give good reasons why.