There are approximately 15-20 cards that are currently implemented on BGA that are just absolutely terrible. You can take a look at the game statistics and find that these cards are rarely drafted; if they are drafted then they are rarely played; if they are played then the player rarely wins. It's poor game design to have cards that are useless in all situations; they essentially just take up space in the draft and/or punish new players that don't realize how terrible they are.
I understand that it took work to implement these cards, so if we don't want to remove them completely then can we at least get a second ban list for them? Or perhaps add them to the existing ban list? I don't see why we shouldn't ban cards for being too weak if we are already banning some for being too strong.
My suggested bans:
I understand that it took work to implement these cards, so if we don't want to remove them completely then can we at least get a second ban list for them? Or perhaps add them to the existing ban list? I don't see why we shouldn't ban cards for being too weak if we are already banning some for being too strong.
My suggested bans:
Loudmouth
Minstrel
Full Peasant
Paymaster
Sugar Baker
Huntsman
Sequestrator
Canal Boatman
Silokeeper
Catcher
Forest Scientist
Bean Counter
------------------
Claw Knife
Elephantgrass Plant
Garden Claw
Civic Facade