Is there anything wrong with 4p?

[AVTactics]

I can see that 4-players games are not popular at all. Today its nearly impossible to get started by just setting a public table.
Is there anything wrong with 4-players mode? Why do YOU not play this mode?

[pbjme]

4p mode seems too chaotic, messy. I have only ever played 2p WC, and am very comfortable with this mode.

[harald68]

i do like 4p, but it seems there are only few available for that.
and everybody should have at least about 150 elo, so that one could assume, that your Partner knows what to do.

[EleaTyrell]

Playing 4p in bga is not fair about the elo won / lost, because although the winning is for 1 team, bga considers there is an equality and lowers the elo of the strongest player of the team. This is not specific to warchest though...

[tchobello]

@Harald68, If ELO matters to you, don't play team games...

The ELO loss even when winning is an issue, yes and BGA team is aware.

4P games in Warchest are about 1% of total games played.
To avoid these problems, play in training mode...

[Nactra]

Regarding the game itself at 4p, there is nothing wrong with it, it is very fun.

Bga needs split elo queues based on mods and variants.