No problem. I won't have a restless night because of it, because my intention was to improve.
Although I don't understand why it's better for someone to reject someone else's improvment ideas just because he didn't like one of them. Of course, maybe I misunderstood you, my English is not that good.
I see that the author and the publisher played a lot of games. Of course they had to do that. I also believe that 2 vs 2 is their favorite. And still, the Arena is 3-player despite several indications, and the Arena rules still say 2 person, 1 match won. (I only mentioned this 3 months ago, but then, correctness is only interesting when someone has a "bad" idea.)
Although I don't understand why it's better for someone to reject someone else's improvment ideas just because he didn't like one of them. Of course, maybe I misunderstood you, my English is not that good.
I see that the author and the publisher played a lot of games. Of course they had to do that. I also believe that 2 vs 2 is their favorite. And still, the Arena is 3-player despite several indications, and the Arena rules still say 2 person, 1 match won. (I only mentioned this 3 months ago, but then, correctness is only interesting when someone has a "bad" idea.)