Here's a link to a table, does this work? https://boardgamearena.com/table?table=480634832
"Defender" scoring -- am I wrong or is the implementation wrong?
Forum rules
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/bugs
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/bugs
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: 08 January 2012, 20:10
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 17 November 2021, 08:22
Re: "Defender" scoring -- am I wrong or is the implementation wrong?
That works! Thanks for taking the time to make the replay!Speusippus wrote: ↑28 February 2024, 08:53 Here's a link to a table, does this work? https://boardgamearena.com/table?table=480634832
Hmm... An expert in the game can probably confirm if what I'm looking at is correct, but it seems at this point is where it shows that it's indeed a bug.
- Ethical Chloroplast
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 30 October 2023, 04:41
Re: "Defender" scoring -- am I wrong or is the implementation wrong?
At this point I think I know what all the cards are by heart.PillarAngel wrote: ↑28 February 2024, 07:49 Speusippus do you happen to have the table number so they can see what it looks like in game? That'll probably be enough to confirm it.
That's a good spot. Do we have a bug report forum?PillarAngel wrote: ↑28 February 2024, 10:58 Hmm... An expert in the game can probably confirm if what I'm looking at is correct, but it seems at this point is where it shows that it's indeed a bug.
Balance-wise I don't think it changes too much too often but that definitely does not agree with the card as written.
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 17 November 2021, 08:22
Re: "Defender" scoring -- am I wrong or is the implementation wrong?
Haha! Perfect that we got your knowledge to solve and confirm this.Ethical Chloroplast wrote: ↑07 March 2024, 09:57 That's a good spot. Do we have a bug report forum?
Balance-wise I don't think it changes too much too often but that definitely does not agree with the card as written.
The bug report forum for Hadrian's Wall is here:
https://boardgamearena.com/bugs?sort=la ... &game=1820
Its currently sorted by last commented on/update, and the top three reports are about the bug. On the first one out of the three that were posted, the dev marked as fixed, but seems the bug still persists.
Can also try asking Mistergos, the dev, directly about it. While I do agree that its a minor bug and shouldn't matter as much, would definetly be nice for it to work as intented as it could cause confusion for newer players.
-
- Posts: 166
- Joined: 08 January 2012, 20:10
Re: "Defender" scoring -- am I wrong or is the implementation wrong?
Honestly I think it's a bigger deal than you two think -- as written, it depends on stone, and in the implementation, it instead depends on blue and black workers. That is huge, completely changing the relationship of resources to each other. I hope this gets fixed soon. I know with coding things tend to be more complicated than I think, but surely this is just basically one bit of code pointing at the wrong other bit of code, maybe even just a one word change?
- Ethical Chloroplast
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 30 October 2023, 04:41
Re: "Defender" scoring -- am I wrong or is the implementation wrong?
I meant something more along the lines where optimal play typically has both fort and wall completely filled since they are so efficient. And if you don't fill fort you can't fill out wall so I typically don't see many games where fort is filled without wall also filled.
Re: "Defender" scoring -- am I wrong or is the implementation wrong?
Defender and Vanguard. Mb problem that is a same Card. Because it makes 13 total cards ? I have only 12 in my box version. Don't have Vanguard in it.
Updade. Sorry Now i get it.
Defender is for all wall sections. Vanguard is only for Wall Guard (sword and soldier section)
I clearly have better translation and wording in my box version
Updade. Sorry Now i get it.
Defender is for all wall sections. Vanguard is only for Wall Guard (sword and soldier section)
I clearly have better translation and wording in my box version