Board Game Arena

Est-ce que n'est possible de jouer aussi jusque à 13 cartes? Nous jouons ce jeu comme vous mais aussi avec 11,12, 13 cartes ... C'est plus amusant et un peu plus difficile...donc on ne dépends pas toujours de la chance...
On peut jouer avec 3,4,5personnes...
Mais votre jeu sur mon tablet.....c'est fantastique !!!


Mirej Verheye(Phinneke)

stampeder17 wrote: ↑28 May 2020, 06:16 How do I get a moderator to actually look at this and see that it is from same game. I do deserve the one report but not the second.

With the appeal denied, I do not believe you have any other recourse.

N_Faker wrote: ↑30 May 2020, 20:15

stampeder17 wrote: ↑28 May 2020, 06:16 How do I get a moderator to actually look at this and see that it is from same game. I do deserve the one report but not the second.

With the appeal denied, I do not believe you have any other recourse.

And this is exactly why they need someone with some familiarity with administrative law to develop their Moderation Policy and moderator training program (I will assume their is currently no training program)...

DrClick wrote: ↑14 May 2020, 12:54 Il y a des choses à améliorer de ce côté là, c'est certain.
Pour le choix entre le pouce rouge et le signalement, ils n'ont pas la même utilité : le pouce rouge est là pour ne pas recommander quelqu'un, alors que le signalement est là quand il y a un problème manifeste à régler.
Mais oui dans l'idéal, une notification en clôture de rapport, ce serait une bonne chose. Mais là encore, il y a parfois des décisions dont vous ne connaissez pas toujours l'issue pour ces raisons de confidentialité.
On va optimiser. Merci pour la suggestion.

Merci pour la réponse, j'ai une autre petite question un peu liée à la précédente. Quand un joueur triche grossièrement, il est souvent signalé par plusieurs joueurs mais n'est sanctionné que dans un seul rapport. Du coup les autres ne voient pas quelle a été la pénalité, ils ont un message de ce type :

Note : This player has been punished for this in another report. We close this report as we do not punish the same person twice for the same fault.

Est-ce qu'on peut éditer le rapport pour poser la question, ou est-ce qu'il faut éviter et est-ce qu'on peut s'y prendre autrement ?

(Dans le cas qui m'intéresse ça n'est pas juste par curiosité, le joueur fausse complètement un classement)

Bonjour,

Je ne sais pas ou demander...

Je me suis pris un report (ou plusieurs) pour avoir quitté des parties en cours alors que c'est totalement faux.

je suis passé de 100% à 61% d'un coup alors que si vous allez voir mes stats, j'ai quitté 1 partie sur 363 ... (et c'était dû à un problème de connexion).

Comment est-ce possible ?

Is there a way to get a post reviewed by a moderator before posting it? (Can I send it to someone for this purpose?)
My potential post is asking for people to join a BGA group I have set up. I want to limit the group to British drivers in Rallyman.
While I have no bad intentions in this, I'm wondering if others could view this as divisive?

Paddles wrote: ↑17 May 2020, 11:46 If someone has been reported and a moderator has a ruling, I see there is a method for the person that has been moderated to dispute the ruling (with a higher penalty for disputing incorrectly). Is there a method for seeking clarification/understanding?

Could not agree more.

Moderation as of now seems highly slanted towards following the accuser and ruling against the accused, hence incentivizing a "file a complaint"-culture, that nobody could truly want. Even the suggested course of action in the current Moderation Policy as response to a complaint received is "file another complaint", asking to ALSO accuse the previous accuser, like a mud throwing match is welcomed and wanted!

To add insult to injury & even worse than the current system of moderation, that seems to ignore wider context (full chat, not just excerpts), coined phrases / wordplay that are unique to certain games (e.g. Werewolves: Cupido ./. STUPIDO) etc., is the fact that elapsed moderations do not disappear in due time. It has been more than the alloted time put in place for moderation based on the petty claims by an individual soured by his own gameplay and yet I am still faced with a flashpage that says "You have been moderated."

This should be fixed immediately as it effectively locks me out of use of a website that I actually was a very happy, premium customer of.

Please address the above asap, in my and anyones case.

Without need for further debate it is grossly out of measure / good balance even IF the alleged things would have been enough ground for a moderation (see my appeal), to lock a player out of the website far beyond the actual moderation.

Regards from a much less satisfied customer,
M3R

who is here in charge of moderation? It is very unfair
I called a rude French person an arrogant French and I got banned for 3 days...
Others insulted my game and got a simple warning...
Are the moderators here heavily skewed toward French audience?

Hello all,

I am new to the site,

I want to ask if it is insulting when saying that someone is playing so bad (he did make many terrible moves)?

Thanks in advance.

tesla-supreme wrote: ↑30 July 2020, 17:20 who is here in charge of moderation? It is very unfair
I called a rude French person an arrogant French and I got banned for 3 days...
Others insulted my game and got a simple warning...
Are the moderators here heavily skewed toward French audience?

Hum, yeah seem unfair (say arrogant, ban 3 days (arrogant is not like the f-word)) (say very bad insult (multiple times) got only a warning)? This is intimidating (players and the modos.) And that is also illegal.