"when a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger"
Personnaly I tested the game during the beta.
There were several bug reports complaining about the interface. I upvoted them, because for me the game is close to be unplayable.
I was surprised to see this game coming out of beta with those issues not taken into account. So I am not surprise about the complains here. Sure they have to be polite, but it is not the main issue here.
I am myself a software developer, i completly understand time & energy put into development project.
However i have the feeling that BGA failed in validating this game out of beta. This game does not respect the BGA guidelines for developers, that are written in BGA studio, about assets readabilty, tooltips, etc.
Sure users have to be polite in their feedback, no doubt about that, but BGA admins should look themself at the bug database and do they really think they should pull this game out of beta ? If yes, i am really interested in the validation logic and the real BGA standards...
Developers do their best in general, but BGA should take the criticisms and failure for themself instead of complaining about user politeness...
If BGA does not fail, a developer does not have to be under fire.
Just my 2 cents of an experienced sofware engineer.