Board Game Arena

I was right! Knew it

Great game, thanks for the smooth play! Any chance that the three expansion pieces will be added soon?

It is a good game but I think it wont be as popular as other bgames (bgames =bga + games and i think it can be motto of the site )

Oso wrote:A game without luck can be a cheat game. Isn't a awesome game, really, if you play lot of times you can reproduce the same strategy lot of times.

Yep. Kind of like chess and go. Those games have no luck, and will therefore die out soon. Once you've played them a few times, there's no fun anymore.[ / sarcasm]

Will they also "train" the pillbug?

Can we download a notation file/sgf?

Jest Phulin wrote:

Oso wrote:A game without luck can be a cheat game. Isn't a awesome game, really, if you play lot of times you can reproduce the same strategy lot of times.

Yep. Kind of like chess and go. Those games have no luck, and will therefore die out soon. Once you've played them a few times, there's no fun anymore.[ / sarcasm]

Well, sarcasm aside, it depends on the complexity. Chess loses a lot of attraction nowadays because computers already "solve" it. Well, it's not really solved from the computer science point of view. But close to. Go is very far away from being solved by computers. I think in Hive the complexity is unknown. And there are no good algorithms and implementations for analysis yet.

Jest Phulin wrote:

Oso wrote:A game without luck can be a cheat game. Isn't a awesome game, really, if you play lot of times you can reproduce the same strategy lot of times.

Yep. Kind of like chess and go. Those games have no luck, and will therefore die out soon. Once you've played them a few times, there's no fun anymore.[ / sarcasm]

It is not so in all games quarto and neutreeko never become boring.But it depends on the peron.

hi,
reading the game description i expected a 2vs2 game (4 player) because it says "The game is played 2 on 2"...
is it a wrong description or i missed something?

@Crow07: you are of course right, it's my English that was at fault here! I fixed the description to say "1 on 1".