DrWreck wrote: ↑26 March 2025, 04:53
- but with that exception I am not hearing a lot of-- "So you should have bought/played THIS card instead."
Cause the thing is, I don't like soil factory, and I don't like Adapted Lichen. I don't even like Solar Power. But, those felt like my only plays. Did I have a better -line- here? Like, beyond clarifying which cards are bad/good.
I am not sure how others do it, but when I am quoting different parts of a post, I quote the entire thing, as you did, and then use copy and paste to surround each portion I wish to quote with the bracket text at the beginning of the quote and the bracketed backslash end quote. (It's difficult to describe without typing it, and if I type it, it will think I'm trying to quote something.
But basically, make it look like this, but with square brackets instead:
(quote=DrWreck post_id=208652 time=1742961209 user_id=1566571)
something something
(/quote)
YOUR REPLY to that something
(quote=DrWreck post_id=208652 time=1742961209 user_id=1566571)
something something part 2
(/quote)
YOUR REPLY to that something part 2
Etc.
To address your question:
If you are not getting good cards, save your money to spend on good cards later. I mean, I'm unsure exactly where this question is coming from. You said you passed Giant Ice Asteroid because you couldn't afford it, yet you're making it sound as though you bought and/or played bad cards because you didn't have anything else to spend your money on.
There will be good cards at some point, expensive cards, and you want to have money to play them. You do not want to have wasted your money on bad cards because you didn't feel as though you had any other options.
Again though, this is why I recommend not playing 3-player with preludes. That setting (which SHOULD end in 9 generations, maybe even 8) can make you feel rushed, and to me, just sems a lot like a crapshoot as people basically just play whatever they get without waiting for much synergy.
Try 2-player without preludes. I'll play you, with those settings, if you wish. Also, you can review any game from any player's perspective. BGA's interface is open information. I do this a lot. I just completed a very tight, closely contested game against a friend who is rated 580. We both had nothing going on early, so we patiently waited until the synergy came, and when it did, we both has the cash to play our hands. It was one of the best games I've been involved in.
If you really want to learn, and want to see the value of cards and of patience and tag synergy, that game would be a good one to review from each player's perspective.