I'm of course not a BGA admin so I can only speculate.FrankJones wrote: ↑31 July 2026, 21:38Perhaps I am. Could you elaborate on that point?
If it creates a drain on system resources, that is a valid reason by BGA. I would think there would be ways around that, such as adding a second tier of premium to generate more revenue, perhaps?
A fear of a drain in system resources could be the main reason and therefore also a fear of extra workload for the admins to review every external program.
Few bots were allowed in a supervised restricted environment for a limited time, but then the developers asked the admins for permission before the bots accessed BGA.
Just for justice reasons the admins would ban any bot (or spider) where the developer didn't ask for permission first. This should not be a popularity contest.
And why should this tfmbot be allowed but not also bots from other developers? Soon BGA would have to assure that the majority of matches are not by bots playing with themselves or other bots for training or competitions to find the better bot.