Page 2 of 2
Re: Pestilent Double Bluff > Promise Double Bluff
Posted: 24 August 2026, 13:45
by Romain672
I think you are wrong springiest since I believe it's a difference between convention's sets.
I will rewrite it nicely:
Played: r1
Bob: b1-x-x-x
Cathy: ?-?-?-?
Donald: x-r3-r1-x
Alice clue 3 to Donald.
Bob plays b1.
What should Cathy do?
What should assume Donald if Cathy doesn't play?
What should assume Donald if Cathy play?
Re: Pestilent Double Bluff > Promise Double Bluff
Posted: 24 August 2026, 19:08
by springiest
both very easy questions!
if cathy does nothing, donald assumes he has r3 exactly.
if cathy plays (say a g1), donald assumes he has any 3 except r3 or g3.
Re: Pestilent Double Bluff > Promise Double Bluff
Posted: 25 August 2026, 07:51
by Blacktango
Why Donald wouldn't assume he has b2-b3-x-x ?
It should look like a self-finesse for blue 1 + 2 + 3, from their point of view. (At least, on BGA.)
Re: Pestilent Double Bluff > Promise Double Bluff
Posted: 25 August 2026, 14:24
by springiest
b1 doesnt connect to 3 (it only connects to b2), so alice's clue is a bluff rather than a finesse if possible.
Cathy's Connecting Principle explains this idea a bit more clearly. for r3 a bluff is possible, for other 3s it is not possible (because no other 3 is a valid bluff target).
this is why, even if donald indeed has `b2 b[3] x x` cathy must STILL blind-play! otherwise donald just assumes he has r3 (which is the only valid bluff target) and does something else.
Re: Pestilent Double Bluff > Promise Double Bluff
Posted: 25 August 2026, 14:54
by Blacktango
OK, this is what Romain explained.
You describe the H-group convention, which is not very played on BGA.
All of your examples make much more sense with the H-group convention.
Re: Pestilent Double Bluff > Promise Double Bluff
Posted: 26 August 2026, 09:22
by springiest
i included that link just to better explain what "connect" means, in case i wasnt doing it clearly enough. it might direct u to a Hgroup document, but that doesnt negate anything i said previously.
i have played a lot of games on various websites (including BGA) where bluffing out an different-colored 1 by clueing "3" to a one-from-playable 3 is allowed. the only thing not allowed on BGA is
3 Bluffs - those are only allowed in Hgroup.
its clear that many people who dont know Hgroup very well have this misconception that clueing "3" to a card to bluff out a 1 (or k5) is a
3 Bluff. that is incorrect - the 3 being clued needs to be
two-from-playable for the bluff to be called that! (dont worry, this is a common misconception even for Hgroup players who are just learning
3 Bluffs!

)