Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Discussions about BGA (all languages)
Forum rules
Warning: challenging a moderation in Forum = 10 days ban
More info & details about how to challenge a moderation: viewtopic.php?p=119756
User avatar
Sherysasz
Posts: 4
Joined: 22 August 2019, 19:46

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by Sherysasz »

I agree that 7 wonders is far less fun with 3, I'd even prefer it at 4 to 5. and 11 people/thousands players, we can do a better survey ...
User avatar
Iskaenderum
Posts: 1
Joined: 29 October 2015, 22:50

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by Iskaenderum »

Newbie here, where can I find the listing of all Arena games and their configurations (not just the changes from Arena S0?
User avatar
Mr_Magic
Posts: 256
Joined: 08 March 2018, 15:59

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by Mr_Magic »

MyNameIsBlue wrote: 16 April 2020, 22:35 Agree with Zojangles that Lost Cities 3 rounds is an optimal improvement.
I would agree. Maybe speed to game up a bit (2 turns per day maybe) but raise it to 3 rounds
User avatar
Een
Posts: 3861
Joined: 16 June 2010, 19:52

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by Een »

Iskaenderum wrote: 19 April 2020, 16:04 Newbie here, where can I find the listing of all Arena games and their configurations (not just the changes from Arena S0?
When on the arena lobby page, you just need to click the "Gear" icon of the game you are interested in to check the options.
User avatar
aajax13
Posts: 1
Joined: 15 March 2016, 04:08

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by aajax13 »

Another player who far prefers 7 Wonders at 4 player.s On BGG, 4-5 player have far more "Best" ratings than the 3-player count as well. I really hope this gets changed for Season 2.
User avatar
sprockitz
Posts: 666
Joined: 23 October 2014, 02:22

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by sprockitz »

It seems most of these changes are focused on the most popular games. I know a lot of the games in the bottom 2/3rds of popularity are good at different player counts and hope they get some consideration for a new setup.

legendary inventors - currently at 3, but also a good game at 2 and 4 (and more strategic at 2)...3 is often a game of choosing which person to mess up
Troyes - currently at 3, but really good at 2 (and more strategic)
Palaces of Carrara - currently at 4, but limits number of matchups due to low popularity. 2 or 3 work just as well. (with 2 being the most strategic)
Tzolk'in - currently at 2. while ideal at 4, trying at least 3 to get more games would be better than the current 2 (which was designed to get more plays in).
User avatar
Frooty_Bazooty
Posts: 13
Joined: 05 April 2020, 08:41

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by Frooty_Bazooty »

I agree with those above who don't like 7 Wonders as a 3 player.

In my opinion, that seems like pandering to the elites who hang out on the forums - Im not convinced that that is what the majority of players would want.
Siccio
Posts: 1
Joined: 25 April 2020, 19:59

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by Siccio »

Hello everyone, thank you for the information and the shared links. I'm going to talk about 7 wonders.

Indeed it seems at first a good compromise to switch 3p / 4p from one season to another.
And it is interesting to see how very different the game becomes.
I wonder if people could vote though, would it be 50-50 or a far majority does prefer the 4+ players configuration.

IMO I find the game more complex because more strategic and surprising in a 4 players set, therefore way more interesting and enjoyable.

Cheers!
User avatar
nmego
Posts: 360
Joined: 27 December 2017, 07:08

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by nmego »

It is taking FOREVER to find a game of raceFTG in arena. I've had easier time finding games for less popular games.

The BoW expansion is infamous for the prestige mechanism, which many hate. Also, everyone agrees that it is one of the most luck-based expansions out there, if not the most. So, can we have that changed as well? Arena should be for competitive play, having an expansion infamous for being luck-based as its "competitive mode" completely ignores the purpose of arena mode.

Now, I don't dislike BoW that much. In fact, I find it quite enjoyable at times, but:
1. I can't find a single match.
2. It is one of the most luck-based expansions.

A poll would be nice, just like what happened with Carcassone.

I've had a post in the raceFTG forum about that, but either nobody really cares about the game anymore (even though it is one of the most popular games) or nobody just visits the raceFTG forum.
User avatar
Pacific rim Rodger
Posts: 2
Joined: 13 May 2020, 18:04

Re: Arena Season 1 - Games configuration changed (complete list)

Post by Pacific rim Rodger »

To Greg the president of BGA bcA I did not quit a game earlyif you look at the very end of the opponents said good game the game was over and we both left just look at the screen you'll see that he said good game and I'll lift and this stuff about caramel seriously 14 point is that people have family emergencies people have other emergencies who knows and you're going to penalize them because they leave a game early there's all kinds of reasons to leave the game early seriously I'm not so sure I even left the game early the first time you sent me a warning
and your service may be fine and that's great that your service is fine but I have Wi-Fi and sometimes it's slow sometimes it disconnects it just because people leaving game early doesn't mean that they intentionally did it phone problems other problems can happen
Locked

Return to “Discussions”