Even though I agree to give the supposedly more experienced player the benefit of the doubt, this is a logical fallacy at best. There are ways to game the system to achieve 800 ELO without even knowing the game too well. Plus, any such argument by default is an argument from authority and therefore no actual argument at all.BlackHatGuy wrote: ↑15 July 2025, 16:24 When we say "X card is better than Y card" what we're really saying is "X card will win you more games".
That's what "better" means.
How do we know which players are better at winning games? ELO. That's what ELO *is*.
So yeah. When the question is "which card is better". And a 500 ELO and 800 ELO player have different opinions, the 800 ELO player is almost always going to be right. Because if they were wrong about which cards are best for winning games, they wouldn't have made it to 800 in the first place.
Discarding data though like the user in question does ... also does not support any of their claims. Can't deny data.