Page 10 of 13
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 30 September 2023, 12:48
by Shobu
Got notified someone posted in the group, but it seems the group is no longer here?
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 15 November 2023, 04:55
by McSchwifty
Kayvon wrote: ↑14 June 2023, 15:24
No players are being added to alpha
Work on this adaptation has been abandoned.
If you're looking to test, do not post.
If you'd like to pick up on its development, it's available.
What do i need to do to pick it up and get it back on track
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 16 February 2024, 16:30
by Molsenolsen
I can’t join group, link doesn’t work?
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 04 June 2024, 06:52
by pmp
Since a week ago this game doesn’t work. I had two open games but I can’t play anymore
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 04 June 2024, 11:34
by FrankReynolds
Somebody please revive this game!
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 27 July 2024, 19:13
by Kayvon
FrankReynolds wrote: ↑04 June 2024, 11:34
Somebody please revive this game!
Go ahead. It's available.
Edit: Unless you mean someone
else should do it for you, which is a rather audacious ask.
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 30 July 2024, 18:41
by AlternativeMilks
Kayvon wrote: ↑27 July 2024, 19:13
FrankReynolds wrote: ↑04 June 2024, 11:34
Somebody please revive this game!
Go ahead. It's available.
Edit: Unless you mean someone
else should do it for you, which is a rather audacious ask.
What's the point of being rude to someone who is enthusiastic about a game with an abandoned implementation? Do you feel better about yourself now?
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 30 July 2024, 18:46
by Kayvon
AlternativeMilks wrote: ↑30 July 2024, 18:41
Kayvon wrote: ↑27 July 2024, 19:13
FrankReynolds wrote: ↑04 June 2024, 11:34
Somebody please revive this game!
Go ahead. It's available.
Edit: Unless you mean someone
else should do it for you, which is a rather audacious ask.
What's the point of being rude to someone who is enthusiastic about a game with an abandoned implementation? Do you feel better about yourself now?
Not being rude. It's clear from the entire thread that the game is available. It's equally clear that lots of people are excited to play it. So I give the asker the benefit of the doubt, hoping he's interested in taking on the project. If not, it's a huge ask to demand that someone else work for free for dozens of hours.
You wouldn't start demanding that someone mow your lawn, file you taxes, or cook you dinner for free. That's nuts. So I make the charitable assumption that the requester isn't doing that here (with the afterthought edit in case he is).
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 31 July 2024, 15:03
by jegharenplan
You are conflating a request/expression of interest with a demand. Nothing in their post implied that they feel entitled to someone else working on the game and the use of 'please' pretty much indicates the opposite. It was nothing like demanding that a specific person do labor on your personal behalf.
It might be an extremely unrealistic request, but that doesn't make it rude because there was no entitlement implied.
Re: Watergate: A card-driven 2-Player game
Posted: 14 August 2024, 00:35
by Kayvon
That's fair. I don't think the requester was trying to be rude. As you said, it's just an audacious ask.
Likewise, my response was not intended to be rude, either. I merely pointed out, after noticing that maybe "please" implied he wanted someone else to do it, that it was a rather audacious ask.
I think there's enough room to grant both the request and the response a charitable interpretation. No one was intending to be rude here.