Is a good game really a good game?
Posted: 22 May 2016, 14:24
Many players text "gg" at the end of a game, sometimes apparently automatically and maybe thoughtlessly, sometimes genuinely thinking that the game was a good one.
However, many games aren't good, for many reasons. If one or more players got crushed like bugs, it might have been a good game for the winner, but it wouldn't have been good for the losers (and in such cases if the winner/s text gg it can look like gloating). If the result was decided by extreme luck - whether good or bad - that isn't a good game. If one or more players played like drunken monkeys (and all too often I'm guilty of this, although I try not to), that isn't a good game either. There are of of course other things that make for a bad game, but for this post those are the key factors.
I think what makes a good game is where everyone played reasonably well, the finish was close, everyone had a chance to win, and the final result was decided mostly by good play. Sadly, such games are relatively rare. Most games are fairly ok, but only ok. Quite a few games aren't at all good, but people still text gg.
I almost never text gg. Too often it's too subjective a judgement. Instead, I much prefer simply to thank people for having played the game. I think it's always ok to say thanks. And if a really bad game is described as good, and I respond negatively, sorry. I usually try to say thanks anyway.
Oh yes, thanks for reading this post
.
However, many games aren't good, for many reasons. If one or more players got crushed like bugs, it might have been a good game for the winner, but it wouldn't have been good for the losers (and in such cases if the winner/s text gg it can look like gloating). If the result was decided by extreme luck - whether good or bad - that isn't a good game. If one or more players played like drunken monkeys (and all too often I'm guilty of this, although I try not to), that isn't a good game either. There are of of course other things that make for a bad game, but for this post those are the key factors.
I think what makes a good game is where everyone played reasonably well, the finish was close, everyone had a chance to win, and the final result was decided mostly by good play. Sadly, such games are relatively rare. Most games are fairly ok, but only ok. Quite a few games aren't at all good, but people still text gg.
I almost never text gg. Too often it's too subjective a judgement. Instead, I much prefer simply to thank people for having played the game. I think it's always ok to say thanks. And if a really bad game is described as good, and I respond negatively, sorry. I usually try to say thanks anyway.
Oh yes, thanks for reading this post