Board Game Arena

what about a second elo ranking for games played at 2p only?
All “more than 2players games” know what I mean...

It already exists
~900+ = 2p player

Yeah, but 700 could be a bad 2p player too... and then a very bad "morethan2p" player !!!

I don't get it, BGA said it shouldn't be ranked cause too easy for cheat, so we can't see our rank when enter a table. But in game page it still ranked

ollyfish2002 wrote:what about a second elo ranking for games played at 2p only?
All “more than 2players games” know what I mean...

Many games offer different styles and gameplays due to variant rules(mainly abstract games), expansion packs, and/or the number of players(PR, RollFTG, RRR, etc.), but all those cases use a single rating value per game. I think it does not make sense to implement separate rating system only for Hanabi.

I'd prefer a -10 ELO for abandoning in hanabi. That would fix most of ELO-difference between 2p and 3+p.

As long as there's no penalty for abandoning there's no need for a Hanabi-2p-ELO anyway because there's just no information about skill to be seen in ELO.

e1q3z9c7 wrote:I don't get it, BGA said it shouldn't be ranked cause too easy for cheat, so we can't see our rank when enter a table. But in game page it still ranked

There are no rank trophies for Hanabi, anymore.