I love this game, and I love the implementation, which is beautiful and very functional with only very minor occasional display glitches. Thank you very much for implementing it! It's a real hit game for BGA.
One thing though I find frustrating - the game only acknowledges winners and losers, and makes no effort to rank those that did not win, assigning relative places based on the number of buildings built (via the obvious method, namely the same used to determine the winner if there was no early victory). This is offputting to all those poor guys that played well but didn't manage to win - all their efforts were in vain, even though they may have technically been second among five. They all end up being mere losers - which is not only frustrating, it also makes it unlikely that people concerned about their rating will play multiplayer games. Can this please be changed?
One thing though I find frustrating - the game only acknowledges winners and losers, and makes no effort to rank those that did not win, assigning relative places based on the number of buildings built (via the obvious method, namely the same used to determine the winner if there was no early victory). This is offputting to all those poor guys that played well but didn't manage to win - all their efforts were in vain, even though they may have technically been second among five. They all end up being mere losers - which is not only frustrating, it also makes it unlikely that people concerned about their rating will play multiplayer games. Can this please be changed?