'Reference' for most bga conventions
Posted: 29 January 2020, 00:35
Hi everyone.
Today I will made pulblic a 'reference' for all bga conventions (and all the things you can deduce/do with them):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Vzg ... Mlyhc/edit#
It's not done for being read in one time because it is 50 pages long.
But if you have questions about a specific move, you can try to search for it.
While playing my games, I will now be able to refers about a specific move, by just sending this link and the name of the move, which is way better.
If anyone already used another terminology for a specific move, send me a message or put both names on this convention.
If you know bga conventions, and aren't agree about one thing when playing with them (which isn't in blue), or if I didn't explained it, send me a message (or add it to the doc in blue). If you think I missed another 'way of thinking' (except for basics), send me a message.
Whatever your level is, please read the introduction of the document.
It has a progressive difficulty, that mean all the later stuff can only be done with a lot of trust on the table (way more than the average table).
This document can actually be edited by everyone, if some people abuse of it, I will remove this option.
Feel free to correct the mistakes / explain some things in a better way in english / put more explanation to some moves / add some screens.
Feel free to gave me feedbacks too
Today I will made pulblic a 'reference' for all bga conventions (and all the things you can deduce/do with them):
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Vzg ... Mlyhc/edit#
It's not done for being read in one time because it is 50 pages long.
But if you have questions about a specific move, you can try to search for it.
While playing my games, I will now be able to refers about a specific move, by just sending this link and the name of the move, which is way better.
If anyone already used another terminology for a specific move, send me a message or put both names on this convention.
If you know bga conventions, and aren't agree about one thing when playing with them (which isn't in blue), or if I didn't explained it, send me a message (or add it to the doc in blue). If you think I missed another 'way of thinking' (except for basics), send me a message.
Whatever your level is, please read the introduction of the document.
It has a progressive difficulty, that mean all the later stuff can only be done with a lot of trust on the table (way more than the average table).
This document can actually be edited by everyone, if some people abuse of it, I will remove this option.
Feel free to correct the mistakes / explain some things in a better way in english / put more explanation to some moves / add some screens.
Feel free to gave me feedbacks too