Conceding

Forum rules
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/#!bugs
User avatar
CaractacusPots
Posts: 90
Joined: 31 August 2020, 18:08

Conceding

Post by CaractacusPots »

If you try to concede a game early on the system gives you a message along the lines of :

"You can not concede a game until 50% of the game has been played"


Pray tell me please, how does the system possibly know when 50% of any game has been reached????


Also sick and tired of losing players conceding just before I bear off my final piece. Just discourteous and blatant way to preserve stats
User avatar
Jest Phulin
Posts: 1856
Joined: 08 July 2013, 21:50

Re: Conceding

Post by Jest Phulin »

CaractacusPots wrote: 15 September 2020, 19:12 If you try to concede a game early on the system gives you a message along the lines of :

"You can not concede a game until 50% of the game has been played"


Pray tell me please, how does the system possibly know when 50% of any game has been reached????
It is an arbitrary counter for every game designed on BGA. There have been several threads throughout the years about how certain games have broken progress meters.
For backgammon, though, I believe it is either a computation of how many pips are needed to bear off the last piece (compared to the starting number of pips required), or simply looking at number of checkers borne off. Either way has issues, though. Total number of pips required is not a constant amount (it will increase whenever a checker is moved to the bar), and much of the game is played before the first checker is actually removed (leading to much of the game staying at 0% progress).
CaractacusPots wrote: 15 September 2020, 19:12 Also sick and tired of losing players conceding just before I bear off my final piece. Just discourteous and blatant way to preserve stats
What stats are they preserving? As noted in the thread on stats, the items that are not included in a conceded game are details of the game itself: average blots hit, number of doubles rolled, total number of dice throws, thinking time used, etc. It still is the same win/loss and ELO adjustment for the participants as if the game had been played to completion.

Yes, it is discourteous to concede on the final move. That has been discussed on site-wide discussions of conceding etiquette. But unless someone is trying to make a case that they win by playing faster than anyone else, no important stats are being preserved.
User avatar
Jest Phulin
Posts: 1856
Joined: 08 July 2013, 21:50

Re: Conceding

Post by Jest Phulin »

After playing some more, It looks like the progress meter is based on number of pips remaining.
User avatar
GreenP55
Posts: 21
Joined: 26 June 2020, 23:15

Re: Conceding

Post by GreenP55 »

In a losing position I would concede only after bearing off one piece - to my mind i have then avoided the Gammon (even if only for technical merit since it means nothing within the BGA platform). If i were playing a friend, i would happily accept them conceding once they had a piece off, (regardless of how many pieces i had left). The exception is when both are bearing off then the loser quits just before the winner gets their final piece off, and i assume that's what you're referring to. Yeah, it's rude.
User avatar
MisterTom
Posts: 10
Joined: 04 October 2020, 09:42

Re: Conceding

Post by MisterTom »

Funnily enough, I was coming to ask if the opposite was considered rude, I.e. making your opponent bear off in a completely lost position on a fiddly interface. If peeps want to concede to me I'm absolutely fine with it...
User avatar
euklid314
Posts: 311
Joined: 06 April 2020, 22:56

Re: Conceding

Post by euklid314 »

I concede as soon it is impossible to win.

If the only chance to win is a double and i roll a 5-2, then I instantly resign. I would consider it strange to waste my and my oppenents time to play on - even if it is only 1 move.
crowdor
Posts: 23
Joined: 10 June 2020, 10:21

Re: Conceding

Post by crowdor »

I also often concede as soon as it's impossible to win. How would that be rude? Is this only about game stats? Do people really enjoy playing out the game? Genuine questions
monsolo
Posts: 1
Joined: 07 August 2022, 05:07

Re: Conceding

Post by monsolo »

I have never found it to be discourteous. The satisfaction is in the victory, not whether or not you remove the last pip. If it is impossible to win, save us the time and effort and concede.

That’s why I prefer to play backgammon with the doubling cube.
Veggie Ninja
Posts: 10
Joined: 12 September 2022, 03:08

Re: Conceding

Post by Veggie Ninja »

I know this is late, but I absolutely find conceding rude (especially at the end of the game). I've had people concede when we're playing our final turns, even when the score is tied - what's the harm in waiting 10 more seconds so that the game can actually be finished? I play these games because I really enjoy playing them, regardless of whether I win or lose, and I truly don't understand people who don't want to finish a game they start.
User avatar
euklid314
Posts: 311
Joined: 06 April 2020, 22:56

Re: Conceding

Post by euklid314 »

In Backgammon - like in chess - a game is often finished by conceding. This is, because good players know when a game is lost and then it is expected from them to resign.

A decent player in chess would be considered VERY inpolite if he is far behind in a game and does not resign and force his opponent to mate him.

The same is true in Backgammon. If you cannot win anymore you should resign and should not force your opponent to remove the remaining checkers unnecessarily. Please note that by conceding = resigning one does indeed finish the game according to the game rules. Conceding is very different from leaving a game prematurely!

If your opponent has resigned too early (i.e. he still has winning chances of say 3%) then he obviously is inexperienced. This happens more often than one may think. Just be happy about the win in such a case...
Post Reply

Return to “Backgammon”