Hello everybody.
First of all, sorry about my english.
I am a regular player of polis. But it is a little frustrating 2 errors in the adaptation of the rules because they change the results of the some games. There are more, but these have changed my results some times.
The first and most important mistake in the rules is the next one:
In order feed his Polis League, the player spends as many wheat resources as the total population he has in the cards. If you don´t have enough, you can lose prestige or return polis to neutrality. But you must spend every wheat you have.
However, in BGA adaptation, if you don´t have enough wheat, you can firstly return polis to neutrality and save wheat to increase the population in other polis. This is an error and a bad interpretation of the rules. And the most important mistake, i think.
The other mistake is in the last round, the game ends before the 5th phase: Goods Adjustment. So the perishable goods should not reduce to half. This can affect a tiebreaker.
What do you think?
These mistakes can be corrected?
thank you.
First of all, sorry about my english.
I am a regular player of polis. But it is a little frustrating 2 errors in the adaptation of the rules because they change the results of the some games. There are more, but these have changed my results some times.
The first and most important mistake in the rules is the next one:
In order feed his Polis League, the player spends as many wheat resources as the total population he has in the cards. If you don´t have enough, you can lose prestige or return polis to neutrality. But you must spend every wheat you have.
However, in BGA adaptation, if you don´t have enough wheat, you can firstly return polis to neutrality and save wheat to increase the population in other polis. This is an error and a bad interpretation of the rules. And the most important mistake, i think.
The other mistake is in the last round, the game ends before the 5th phase: Goods Adjustment. So the perishable goods should not reduce to half. This can affect a tiebreaker.
What do you think?
These mistakes can be corrected?
thank you.