Without a doubt that isn't true.
As others have stated look at the Arena leagues - plenty of people high up the table in luck based games who are non premium. Surely they didn't get there by just never getting matched against premium opponents.
Without a doubt that isn't true.
If you aren't a troll...
Maybe because those who are prenium are those who are more invested/who plays more?
If that were true it would be a sad indictment of the educational system but I think given the rest of your post we can take it with a pinch of salt - as the Cohen brother's once said "we made everything else up why can't we make that up".
Thats a cheap reply hitting one below the belt. I do not want to honour that with another reply. I am writing here only to say that this is why I refrained from writing the observations here. So do several others who talk to me privately about the same pay to get-good-rolls aspect. Anyway, wish you happy sarcastic commenting.
Makes sense. Its just that I have less time available away from work and family. I spend that time in playing some games. Some day I will put my observations together and publish it here. Its all about time and nothing more. By the way, it is not about the number of times a number rolls. Its about the timing of those rolls! When what number rolls to aid a premium member towards a win. Winning depends on his strategy.Jegpeg wrote: ↑26 March 2024, 13:27 As you have a maths major do it properly set up a null hypothesis (e.g. Premiums roll a 7 on 1/6th of their rolls) and a null hypothesis (they roll more than that). DEcide which rolls will be included in the trial (e.g the next 300 rolls by preiums in games you are involved in).
Post here (or in Catan) the details of your experiment before you start and then post the results along with the confidence level of rejected the null hypothesis.
Accusing hte site of cheating is a pretty strong claim but if you can reject the null hypothesis with 99% certainty I would suggest you repeat the test possibly with more trials. If you reject it at 99.99% confident I think you have made your case.
Yes. If BGA does it, its fine by me too. How else could the cost of those servers get covered? I am trying to discuss possible strategies to circumvent it, if there is an identifiable pattern.
No. I am not. I am a passionate Catan enthusiast since 2004. BGA has the best online interface for the game. Yet, I am not happy with the non-random rolls. The other Catan websites which have lower quality interface has true random rolls. Having worked in data stream analysis for decades, I can tell a random stream from the other. Its instinct but it cannot be proven in public unless the data is shared. I get it.
Possible. But my new strategy works every time when I can successfully place the first two settlements based on my premium-specific-hex-number theory. If those hexes are occupied by others, I already know which numbers will fall more and they do. Agreed that I may need to play a 100 more games using the same strategy to be 100% sure.
Somewhere in the forum or elsewhere people have discussed about a possible php hack but I think the rolls come directly from the server. Anyway, I am not interested in cheating. If so, I would rather play the game alone with myself. Whats the fun in that? I don't enjoy cheating. I stand to gain nothing from it.
Plausible theory. Cannot deny. But a non-premium player who reached Rank 1 in an Arena season told me that the day after he reached the top position, he lost 9 games in a row. He said all his hex numbers simply stopped rolling and he did not know why. All those games were won by a premium player. That's not coincidence.