Supernatural bad luck?

[SluggerBaloney]

Deleted

[SluggerBaloney]

Deleted

[Romain672]

5 out of 10 is not 5 in a row so your little experiment is pointless

You just ignored my first post, which was the base of the second:

You are just remembering wrongly (or lieing in purpose, which is worst).
The max you got in your 10 last game is three babylon in a row.
Then you got another wonder, then another babylon, then i think two others wonders, then babylon.

It's way more likely to have all that.

Your history is there: https://boardgamearena.com/gamestats?pl ... finished=0 . Feel free to check what I said.

[Een]

On a more interesting note, better random is on the way https://www.zx2c4.com/projects/linux-rng-5.17-5.18/ (but that probably won't change a bit the probability of rants about randomness in the forums).

Will the bga_rand() function use this new upgrade?

Certainly someday, but this is still fresh kernel work, so it will take time to trickle down in main linux distributions, and/or need server upgrades. I just mentioned this as it was somewhat relevant to the topic, but there is no specific rush as current RNG on linux is already considered pretty good, and anyway that won't solve any of the perception issues about randomness since they are on the human brain side