Hi
First of all, thanks for the great implementation of a wonderful game! You are doing an excellent job indeed!
I would ask a question anyway: in a 2-way game, why the Concede action is not given to a player until half past the second part of the second scenario. To better explaining: you are playing a scenario where you win after 4 flags; say that you lose the first match 4-0; in the revenge match, your opponent gets the first flag and so he has already won the scenario. Why you have to wait until half the scenario is played (so, I imagine, one player gets 2 flags) before you may concede the game (as you have already lost)? There is no reason to waste time playing that game if you prefer to quit. I don't think this unfair or unsportmanlike. Simply, there is no reason to play further (my opinion, of course)
Sorry if my english is not good enough
First of all, thanks for the great implementation of a wonderful game! You are doing an excellent job indeed!
I would ask a question anyway: in a 2-way game, why the Concede action is not given to a player until half past the second part of the second scenario. To better explaining: you are playing a scenario where you win after 4 flags; say that you lose the first match 4-0; in the revenge match, your opponent gets the first flag and so he has already won the scenario. Why you have to wait until half the scenario is played (so, I imagine, one player gets 2 flags) before you may concede the game (as you have already lost)? There is no reason to waste time playing that game if you prefer to quit. I don't think this unfair or unsportmanlike. Simply, there is no reason to play further (my opinion, of course)
Sorry if my english is not good enough