Board Game Arena

From my point of few this game is really badly programmed.
Often the game is not balanced.
As solutions, the logic rhythm should be improved to make the game fairer:
- Starting round: Players should be given similarly fair numbers, not someone 1-20 and the other 9-13
- The probability of new tiles should be taken into account
- It would be nice if the logarithm also took into account the strength of the game: lower players have it a little easier than stronger players

This is a luck based game,so it can't be "fairer".
And no house rules,unless u can convince developer to change the rules.
For ur last point, it's impossible, they're already players complaining the game is biased.
If u really implement that, higher elo player WILL ragequit lol.

It can be fairer, but that requires more commitment from the developers to make the game more meaningful.


Nice example: opponent has numbers between 3-19 at the start, and I have 11-15. I think this can be done better on the programmers' side otherwise there is a big disadvantage right from the start, especially if there are no lower numbers for me for 6 rounds.

With a simple logic rhythm this can be improved and the game will also be better.

What is logic rhythm?

What logarythm?

(Yes, I know.)

If u want "fair" by manipulating luck, just go play chess.
Or balatro, or bingle bingle.

The game would be extremely boring if it's really fair.
Because first player will always win.

SwissChris2 wrote: ↑10 July 2024, 16:14 It can be fairer, but that requires more commitment from the developers to make the game more meaningful.


Nice example: opponent has numbers between 3-19 at the start, and I have 11-15. I think this can be done better on the programmers' side otherwise there is a big disadvantage right from the start, especially if there are no lower numbers for me for 6 rounds.

With a simple logic rhythm this can be improved and the game will also be better.

I think what you mean to say is "algorithm", instead of "logic rhythm".

zoomboom wrote: ↑13 July 2024, 03:46

SwissChris2 wrote: ↑10 July 2024, 16:14 It can be fairer, but that requires more commitment from the developers to make the game more meaningful.


Nice example: opponent has numbers between 3-19 at the start, and I have 11-15. I think this can be done better on the programmers' side otherwise there is a big disadvantage right from the start, especially if there are no lower numbers for me for 6 rounds.

With a simple logic rhythm this can be improved and the game will also be better.

I think what you mean to say is "algorithm", instead of "logic rhythm".

I like logic rhythm. It sounds like a new game combining boolean algebra with Beat Saber.

Meeplelowda wrote: ↑13 July 2024, 09:48 I like logic rhythm. It sounds like a new game combining boolean algebra with Beat Saber.

I would definitely play this!

How is it fairer if you make the game easier for lower ELO players? A fair game should have all players equal, regardless of ranking.

Also the game is called Lucky Numbers, like it's literally in the name. I don't understand the point in wanting to change the game when its main aspect is that there's luck involved, it's in the name of the game itself...