Anachrony Tournament Stats - The Turnaround
Posted: 27 May 2025, 23:38
Thanks again to everyone who participated in the Tourney! I'm very happy with how many people we were able to get within 2 weeks for a quick tournament! Congrats to TheArrogantFrog for the win!!
Participate in the next tournament
Raw Stats can be found here
Discord
Previous Tournament Stats
Due to me setting up the matches for 10 days, a lot of them timed out. I'll make sure to have this be a little bit longer next time. We ended with 25 good matches to base the data off of. (22 were scrapped away due to time out or something else)
The logs don't show this, but Paths were chosen randomly and we were on B (async) side.
First, Average Score By Player. It's quite interesting seeing how much Era 5 and 6 differ.
By Round: It's very fun to see that you can expect around 20 extra points on Era 6, then an additional 10 points on Era 7. Maybe it's worth to have some of these sorted out by path? You can see that on the google sheet link above.
High Scores! While I did have 103, I was only able to achieve that with someone passing towards the end. But overall these scores are quite impressive!!
Game Ended In Era X scores. Player 1 winning in Era 5 peeks it's head out once again. It's very interesting how much more consistent it is compared to player 2. I think adding in "who went first after impact" could also be very very interesting.
Average Score by Faction. Dominance and Harmony still coming out strong here. I personally had a lot of rough games as Progress.
Buildings, sorted by times used. 307/308 come out strong once again. 201 is very popular but that doesn't surprise me with many factions using resources for mechs.
114 finally got a lot of love this time around. I still think it gives just too much flexibility with warp tiles in addition to many points.
Superprojects stats: This time Neutronium Research Center was played twice, but won no games, heavily differing from previous tournament. I personally got wrecked by Archive of the eras twice. RPeter did a wonderful job beating me without evacing with it.
While personally I went 3-8, I had a wonderful time against everyone, and I'm looking forward to
I would love to hear your thoughts!
Do you see something within this data that surprises you?
Do you think future tournaments should be Manual Path or Automatic?
Make sure to sign up for the next tourney! Single Elim: https://boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=401465
Participate in the next tournament
Raw Stats can be found here
Discord
Previous Tournament Stats
Due to me setting up the matches for 10 days, a lot of them timed out. I'll make sure to have this be a little bit longer next time. We ended with 25 good matches to base the data off of. (22 were scrapped away due to time out or something else)
The logs don't show this, but Paths were chosen randomly and we were on B (async) side.
First, Average Score By Player. It's quite interesting seeing how much Era 5 and 6 differ.
Code: Select all
Player | Rounds Played | Avg Score
-------------------|---------------|-----------
gustov79 | 5.00 | 65.00
| 6.00 | 84.50
| 7.00 | 88.00
JanErikTheGreat | 5.00 | 51.50
| 6.00 | 67.50
LilyOfValleys | 5.00 | 57.50
| 6.00 | 84.75
| 7.00 | 85.00
other-other | 6.00 | 81.33
| 7.00 | 95.50
RPeter22 | 5.00 | 63.50
| 6.00 | 71.00
| 7.00 | 98.00
RybaMbu | 6.00 | 63.25
| 7.00 | 80.00
TheArrogantFrog | 5.00 | 53.50
| 6.00 | 78.83
Zaypex | 5.00 | 38.00
| 6.00 | 80.40
zhommart | 5.00 | 59.00
-------------------|---------------|-----------
Grand Total | | 72.20
Code: Select all
Rounds Played | Player | Avg Score
--------------|------------------|-----------
5 | gustov79 | 65.00
| JanErikTheGreat | 51.50
| LilyOfValleys | 57.50
| RPeter22 | 63.50
| TheArrogantFrog | 53.50
| Zaypex | 38.00
| zhommart | 59.00
5 Total | | 55.43
6 | gustov79 | 84.50
| JanErikTheGreat | 67.50
| LilyOfValleys | 84.75
| other-other | 81.33
| RPeter22 | 71.00
| RybaMbu | 63.25
| TheArrogantFrog | 78.83
| Zaypex | 80.40
6 Total | | 76.40
7 | gustov79 | 88.00
| LilyOfValleys | 85.00
| other-other | 95.50
| RPeter22 | 98.00
| RybaMbu | 80.00
7 Total | | 90.33
Code: Select all
Player | Score
-----------------|------
Zaypex | 103
other-other | 99
RPeter22 | 98
LilyOfValleys | 92
other-other | 92
Game Ended In Era X scores. Player 1 winning in Era 5 peeks it's head out once again. It's very interesting how much more consistent it is compared to player 2. I think adding in "who went first after impact" could also be very very interesting.
Code: Select all
Rounds Played | Winner Position | Avg Score (σ Dev)
--------------|-----------------|------------------
5 | player 1 | 61.63 (σ 9.07)
| player 2 | 47.17 (σ 15.84)
6 | player 1 | 75.38 (σ 8.75)
| player 2 | 76.77 (σ 13.71)
7 | player 1 | 98.50 (σ 0.71)
| player 2 | 86.25 (σ 5.06)
Average Score by Faction. Dominance and Harmony still coming out strong here. I personally had a lot of rough games as Progress.
Code: Select all
Path | Score (σ Dev) | Evac Pts (σ Dev)
----------------------|--------------------|------------------
Path of Dominance | 76.23 (σ 15.83) | 17.46 (σ 6.85)
Path of Harmony | 75.09 (σ 16.96) | 19.64 (σ 10.34)
Path of Progress | 68.14 (σ 15.75) | 14.93 (σ 5.90)
Path of Salvation | 69.92 (σ 19.21) | 17.67 (σ 6.79)
Buildings, sorted by times used. 307/308 come out strong once again. 201 is very popular but that doesn't surprise me with many factions using resources for mechs.
114 finally got a lot of love this time around. I still think it gives just too much flexibility with warp tiles in addition to many points.
Code: Select all
Building | Win Rate | Times Used | Wins | Losses | Avg Build Order
------------|----------|------------|------|--------|------------------
307/308 | 0.679 | 28 | 19 | 9 | 4.00
305/306 | 0.444 | 18 | 8 | 10 | 4.17
201 | 0.643 | 14 | 9 | 5 | 4.00
314 | 0.615 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 3.46
102/103 | 0.750 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 5.25
209 | 0.545 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 4.27
313 | 0.455 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 3.55
311/312 | 0.636 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 4.64
114 | 0.600 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 3.70
210 | 0.600 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 4.40
105/106 | 0.400 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 5.60
104 | 0.400 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 4.10
409 | 0.556 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 5.89
115 | 0.556 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 4.44
202 | 0.556 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 2.56
204 | 0.444 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 4.56
205 | 0.222 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 4.44
309 | 0.375 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 4.25
413 | 0.625 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 4.75
310 | 0.500 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4.00
207 | 0.625 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 2.38
208 | 0.250 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 5.50
412 | 0.833 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4.67
107 | 0.667 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4.83
111 | 0.833 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 4.00
303/304 | 0.167 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 3.50
203 | 0.333 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 6.83
414 | 0.333 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 3.67
212 | 0.667 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 3.33
410 | 0.600 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3.60
405 | 0.200 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 6.20
113 | 0.600 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 4.40
112 | 0.200 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 5.20
407 | 0.400 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3.20
Uranium cores| 0.000 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6.50
415 | 0.500 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5.25
101 | 0.750 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4.50
215 | 0.500 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5.00
109 | 0.750 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7.00
401 | 0.750 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6.50
110 | 0.250 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6.50
301/302 | 0.250 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2.75
Tectonic drill|0.667 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6.00
213 | 0.000 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3.00
403 | 0.667 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 4.67
402 | 0.667 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8.67
408 | 0.333 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4.00
315 | 1.000 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7.67
214 | 0.500 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.50
404 | 0.500 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6.00
211 | 0.500 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7.00
406 | 0.000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.00
Code: Select all
Building | Win Rate | Times Used | Wins | Losses | Avg Build Order
-----------------------------|----------|------------|------|--------|------------------
Archive of the eras | 0.667 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 7.33
Quantum chameleon | 0.600 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6.00
Welfare Society | 0.000 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6.25
Continuum stabilizer | 1.000 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7.50
Rescue pods | 1.000 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 6.00
Anti-gravity field | 1.000 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5.00
Neutronium research center | 0.000 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7.50
Dark matter converter | 0.000 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3.00
The ultimate plan | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.00
Outback conditioner | 0.000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5.00
Exocrawler | 1.000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7.00
Particle collider|0.000 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.00
I would love to hear your thoughts!
Do you see something within this data that surprises you?
Do you think future tournaments should be Manual Path or Automatic?
Make sure to sign up for the next tourney! Single Elim: https://boardgamearena.com/tournament?id=401465
