Tournament Stats - The Circle
Posted: 28 December 2025, 20:28
Thank you all for joining "The Circle" tournament! Lots of high rollers in this one and there's some fun stats along with it. Congrats to RPeter22 for winning all 14 of their games!!
Join next tournament
Raw Stats ('Tournaments' and 'Tournaments Data' tab)
Discord
Previous Tournament Stats (The Turnaround)
Previous Tournament Stats (The Round)
With 15 players, we had 105 games. 11 of those games ended in a non-natural way (timeout or giving up), leaving us with 94 games that we can reliable take data from.
The logs don't show this but Paths were chosen randomly and we were on B (async) side, same as The Turnaround.
Average score by Player:
LilyOfValleys managed to pull away with the highest score of 86.36 overall, then Oblividan with 83.57, and RPeter having 83.43. I imagine RPeter22 never getting to an era 7 game would account for this, but winning is all that matters.
High Scores:
GaianeK and Lily both had a 110 game, and Oblividan had a 106 game, all needing to go to era 7.
The highest score in games ended in era 6 goes to LilyOfValleys with 100, 99, 99 games.
Highest score in era 5 still goes to Lily with 79, RPeter22 had a 76, and caselli/Sir Beaverton had a 70 point game.
Game Ended in Era X scores:
Similar to last time, You can expect around +18 points between era 5 and 6, with an additional +7 for era 7.
BUT Player 1 seems to run away with games in era 5 &6, but Player 2 bounces back in era 7. Overall, player 1 winrate is around 57%, seemingly giving you a good advantage, but at least Player 2 can recover in era 7.
Average Score by Faction:
Very very consistent scores across the board here, which is fantastic!
So consistent that I wanted to delve deeper and go by leader as well. Unsurprising to me, Haulani is at the bottom, but still overall these are all very consistent in my eyes.
Buildings:
These buildings were the top 5 win rates. It's worth noting that 307/308 were built in 91 out of 94 games. The math gets a little wonky there because technically 307 could be built by winner, then 308 built by loser, but still love seeing 113 being at the top here.
Super Projects:
This is ALL superprojects sorted by win rate. These are much more specific to games, but I am surprised to see Neutronium Research Center with 0 wins. But Temporal tourism continues to be a great building.
Actions:
Unsurprisingly, if you are taking more actions, you end up winning more often, some actions much more drastically than others. Who would have guessed that good management and good engines win games *shrug*
I'd love to hear what you think of this!
Is there a stat you think is missing?
What did RPeter do to win in your game?
Join next tournament
Raw Stats ('Tournaments' and 'Tournaments Data' tab)
Discord
Previous Tournament Stats (The Turnaround)
Previous Tournament Stats (The Round)
With 15 players, we had 105 games. 11 of those games ended in a non-natural way (timeout or giving up), leaving us with 94 games that we can reliable take data from.
The logs don't show this but Paths were chosen randomly and we were on B (async) side, same as The Turnaround.
Average score by Player:
LilyOfValleys managed to pull away with the highest score of 86.36 overall, then Oblividan with 83.57, and RPeter having 83.43. I imagine RPeter22 never getting to an era 7 game would account for this, but winning is all that matters.
Code: Select all
Player | Rounds Played | Avg Score
----------------|---------------|-----------
LilyOfValleys | 5.00 | 63.67
| 6.00 | 90.80
| 7.00 | 110.00
Oblividan | 5.00 | 50.50
| 6.00 | 82.83
| 7.00 | 95.33
RPeter22 | 5.00 | 66.33
| 6.00 | 88.09
Zaypex | 5.00 | 61.00
| 6.00 | 78.78
| 7.00 | 101.00
GaianeK | 5.00 | 47.00
| 6.00 | 74.38
| 7.00 | 89.00
Sir Beaverton | 5.00 | 57.00
| 6.00 | 74.44
RybaMbu | 5.00 | 49.00
| 6.00 | 70.50
| 7.00 | 83.40
caselli | 5.00 | 60.00
| 6.00 | 69.00
| 7.00 | 73.00
Msion09 | 5.00 | 50.00
| 6.00 | 61.00
| 7.00 | 73.25
Paul2006 | 5.00 | 36.00
| 6.00 | 60.17
| 7.00 | 77.57
Behnamshd | 5.00 | 50.00
| 6.00 | 68.50
| 7.00 | 71.25
13teFee | 6.00 | 60.63
| 7.00 | 69.80
ulliulli | 5.00 | 34.00
| 6.00 | 58.75
| 7.00 | 58.50
Selkorma | 5.00 | 36.00
| 6.00 | 55.20
Jotuchna | 5.00 | 39.00
| 6.00 | 43.40
| 7.00 | 60.80
----------------|---------------|-----------
Grand Total | | 70.45
High Scores:
GaianeK and Lily both had a 110 game, and Oblividan had a 106 game, all needing to go to era 7.
The highest score in games ended in era 6 goes to LilyOfValleys with 100, 99, 99 games.
Highest score in era 5 still goes to Lily with 79, RPeter22 had a 76, and caselli/Sir Beaverton had a 70 point game.
Game Ended in Era X scores:
Similar to last time, You can expect around +18 points between era 5 and 6, with an additional +7 for era 7.
Code: Select all
Rounds Played | Winner Position | Avg Score (σ Dev)
--------------|-----------------|------------------
5 | player 1 | 53.60 (σ 12.46)
| player 2 | 53.38 (σ 14.17)
6 | player 1 | 71.61 (σ 15.32)
| player 2 | 71.18 (σ 15.24)
7 | player 1 | 79.83 (σ 17.68)
| player 2 | 76.53 (σ 14.81)
Code: Select all
Rounds Played | Player 1 Wins | Player 2 Wins | P1 Win Rate | P2 Win Rate
--------------|----------------|----------------|-------------|-------------
5 | 10 | 4 | 71.4% | 28.6%
6 | 35 | 20 | 63.6% | 36.4%
7 | 9 | 16 | 36.0% | 64.0%
Average Score by Faction:
Very very consistent scores across the board here, which is fantastic!
Code: Select all
Path | Score (σ) | Evac Pts (σ)
------------------|------------------|------------------
Dominance | 70.49 (σ 16.35) | 15.76 (σ 7.18)
Harmony | 69.78 (σ 17.45) | 17.89 (σ 9.17)
Progress | 70.93 (σ 15.87) | 16.57 (σ 6.84)
Salvation | 70.62 (σ 17.87) | 16.98 (σ 8.15)
Code: Select all
Path | Leader | Score (σ) | Evac Pts (σ)
------------------|--------------------------------|------------------|------------------
Dominance | Captain Wolfe | 72.93 (σ 16.56) | 16.48 (σ 7.82)
| Treasure Hunter Samira | 67.75 (σ 16.01) | 14.96 (σ 6.46)
Harmony | Matriarch Zaida | 71.20 (σ 17.47) | 18.75 (σ 8.92)
| Patriarch Haulani | 60.33 (σ 15.32) | 12.17 (σ 9.54)
Progress | Librarian Cornella | 74.13 (σ 10.54) | 15.19 (σ 5.08)
| Patron Valerian | 69.11 (σ 18.17) | 17.36 (σ 7.65)
Salvation | High Sunwalker Amena | 72.59 (σ 17.17) | 18.09 (σ 8.15)
| Shepherd Caratacus | 66.40 (σ 19.20) | 14.60 (σ 7.90)
These buildings were the top 5 win rates. It's worth noting that 307/308 were built in 91 out of 94 games. The math gets a little wonky there because technically 307 could be built by winner, then 308 built by loser, but still love seeing 113 being at the top here.
Code: Select all
Building | Used | Wins | Build Order | Losses | Win Rate
-------------|------|------|-------------|--------|----------
113 | 20 | 16 | 4.75 | 4 | 0.800
413 | 28 | 22 | 4.61 | 6 | 0.786
104 | 26 | 20 | 5.08 | 6 | 0.769
205 | 19 | 14 | 4.32 | 5 | 0.737
307/308 | 91 | 65 | 3.47 | 26 | 0.714
Super Projects:
This is ALL superprojects sorted by win rate. These are much more specific to games, but I am surprised to see Neutronium Research Center with 0 wins. But Temporal tourism continues to be a great building.
Code: Select all
Building | Used | Wins | Build Order | Losses | Win Rate
----------------------------|------|------|-------------|--------|----------
Rescue pods | 1 | 1 | 9.000 | 0 | 1.000
Synthetic endorphins | 1 | 1 | 5.000 | 0 | 1.000
The ultimate plan | 6 | 5 | 5.333 | 1 | 0.833
Particle collider | 4 | 3 | 5.000 | 1 | 0.750
Temporal tourism | 14 | 10 | 5.143 | 4 | 0.714
Grand reservoir | 7 | 5 | 4.286 | 2 | 0.714
Quantum chameleon | 7 | 5 | 4.143 | 2 | 0.714
Archive of the eras | 10 | 7 | 6.300 | 3 | 0.700
Anti-gravity field | 8 | 5 | 3.625 | 3 | 0.625
Tectonic drill | 8 | 4 | 5.125 | 4 | 0.500
Exocrawler | 4 | 2 | 5.750 | 2 | 0.500
Welfare Society | 11 | 5 | 4.818 | 6 | 0.455
Outback conditioner | 5 | 2 | 6.000 | 3 | 0.400
Uranium cores | 10 | 3 | 6.300 | 7 | 0.300
Cloning vat | 4 | 1 | 4.750 | 3 | 0.250
Continuum stabilizer | 11 | 2 | 4.909 | 9 | 0.182
Neutronium research center | 3 | 0 | 6.333 | 3 | 0.000
Dark matter converter | 1 | 0 | 2.000 | 1 | 0.000
Actions:
Unsurprisingly, if you are taking more actions, you end up winning more often, some actions much more drastically than others. Who would have guessed that good management and good engines win games *shrug*
Code: Select all
| Action Type | Winners | Losers |
| ---------------------- | ------ | ----- |
| Recruit | 7.35 | 5.36 |
| Research | 3.35 | 2.22 |
| Council | 4.14 | 3.59 |
| Construct | 7.73 | 7.19 |
| Mine | 6.33 | 6.31 |
| Anomaly | 1.22 | 1.06 |
| Evacuate (actions) | 2.08 | 1.92 |
| Evacuation Points | 18.05 | 14.18 |
Is there a stat you think is missing?
What did RPeter do to win in your game?