Page 1 of 1
USE PACIFIC ?
Posted: 20 March 2026, 14:33
by Duncan TMS
Perhaps this question has already been asked on BGG or elsewhere! Why isn't the Pacific front with the USE rules architecture created?
Re: USE PACIFIC ?
Posted: 20 March 2026, 21:57
by Lunalol
You will have more chance to have an answer on BGG.
I remember that Sal talked about that some years ago...
Re: USE PACIFIC ?
Posted: 21 March 2026, 19:27
by Duncan TMS
Merci pour l'info, mais je n'ai rien trouvé.
Re: USE PACIFIC ?
Posted: 22 March 2026, 00:09
by Lunalol
En fait, essaye de poser la question sur BGG.
Re: USE PACIFIC ?
Posted: 01 November 2026, 11:26
by tarkalak
Duncan TMS wrote: ↑20 March 2026, 14:33
Perhaps this question has already been asked on BGG or elsewhere! Why isn't the Pacific front with the USE rules architecture created?
There's War in the Pacific from Mark Herman. Lunalol even hinted to making a bga of it, but nothing happened. I think he couldn't get permission from Mark Herman or something.
As for USE, the navy side of USE is completely unworkable for the Pacific. Grand land fronts like in Europe only happened in China, and even that was a side front and kind of a stalemate most of the time. So the USE system is not feasible without remaking it.
Re: USE PACIFIC ?
Posted: 01 November 2026, 11:30
by Lunalol
He didn't even bother to reply...
Re: USE PACIFIC ?
Posted: 01 November 2026, 14:33
by Duncan TMS
Quant à moi,après avoir passé plusieurs mois et je pense plusieurs années dans le futur, effectivement, ce système de jeu n'a rien à voir avec le front Pacifique. Par contre, les règles du jeu peuvent être réduites en dessous d'une armée, je joue en ce moment un scénario uchronique de ma conception dont les rapports sont transmis via BGG sur le forum dédié:
https://boardgamegeek.com/thread/378632 ... l-in-egypt . Je peux affirmer que cela est possible. Et même mieux, en affinant le scénario, toutes les règles du jeu pourraient être mises en pratique.
