People who pick Carpenter but then don't play it
Posted: 30 April 2026, 11:33
This is something I've seen a few times and I find it particularly annoying.
Usually when your opponent picks Carpenter and hasn't turned a card yet, this gives you a guarantee that one of their remaining spots will have to be filled with a turned down card. It's really helpful because it allows you to know exactly how many points they will be earning from that spot.
The problem is that sometimes, people who picked Carpenter realize that they can get more points than the expected 8 (+2) points by buying another card instead. So they never do their Carpenter and end up with more points than you had anticipated.
I find this sort of playstyle very sneaky and opportunistic. It's like they are "tricking" their opponent by ending up doing more points than they should have. And I don't know, I feel that it's wrong to pick up a card and end up never making use of it, doing something else instead just because it benefits you more. That doesn't seem a very elegant or fair way to play the game.
(This is particularly an issue when your opponent has Brigand and you think "well, they are only going to do 14 points out of it at most, because they have Carpenter", but instead they end up just dismissing their Carpenter and doing the 21 points anyway)
Usually when your opponent picks Carpenter and hasn't turned a card yet, this gives you a guarantee that one of their remaining spots will have to be filled with a turned down card. It's really helpful because it allows you to know exactly how many points they will be earning from that spot.
The problem is that sometimes, people who picked Carpenter realize that they can get more points than the expected 8 (+2) points by buying another card instead. So they never do their Carpenter and end up with more points than you had anticipated.
I find this sort of playstyle very sneaky and opportunistic. It's like they are "tricking" their opponent by ending up doing more points than they should have. And I don't know, I feel that it's wrong to pick up a card and end up never making use of it, doing something else instead just because it benefits you more. That doesn't seem a very elegant or fair way to play the game.
(This is particularly an issue when your opponent has Brigand and you think "well, they are only going to do 14 points out of it at most, because they have Carpenter", but instead they end up just dismissing their Carpenter and doing the 21 points anyway)