After "going back with an option is not an option"
Posted: 04 May 2026, 15:15
After many users expressed their discomfort,
you responded not with empathy or solutions,
but with an arrogant statement.
If you’re going to prioritize visual aesthetics or perfect fidelity to the physical cards,
then open a board game museum—
not a website meant for countless people to enjoy.
When people grew angry at your arrogant statement,
you posted an apology—
without even deleting the previous post.
Thank you for the apology,
but what we need is a real, practical solution.
Please don’t forget that the site you’re trying to make beautiful
is only possible because of the many board game lovers who use it.
Listen to their voices.
PS. Did you ever even try playing it before the update?
Isn’t BGA a huge company?
It’s surprising that there wasn’t even do basic check.
That’s quite questionable—and honestly disappointing.
you responded not with empathy or solutions,
but with an arrogant statement.
If you’re going to prioritize visual aesthetics or perfect fidelity to the physical cards,
then open a board game museum—
not a website meant for countless people to enjoy.
When people grew angry at your arrogant statement,
you posted an apology—
without even deleting the previous post.
Thank you for the apology,
but what we need is a real, practical solution.
Please don’t forget that the site you’re trying to make beautiful
is only possible because of the many board game lovers who use it.
Listen to their voices.
PS. Did you ever even try playing it before the update?
Isn’t BGA a huge company?
It’s surprising that there wasn’t even do basic check.
That’s quite questionable—and honestly disappointing.
