Page 1 of 1
Did I misunderstand or is this a bug?
Posted: 26 August 2026, 19:52
by RomyHL
In game Table #905659192 I had all three accounts confirm the motive for Greg as the financial motive, so I checked all three boxes. I had a suspicion G was the culprit. But then I got a police confirmation that the motive was NOT financial. This made me eliminate Greg as the culprit (i.e. his motive was indeed the financial one, but he was not the culprit).
In the end, the solution was revealed as Greg as the culprit, but with another motive (this motive was indicated by one other person). How is this possible? Did both people AND the investigation card (spyglass) lie about his financial motive?
Re: Did I misunderstand or is this a bug?
Posted: 11 September 2026, 02:53
by ViolentSilence
How do I view a finished table? I can't remember how to do it at the moment so can't look at the issue. One thing I do remember from the physical game is that the murderer and the accomplice can lie, so maybe check the sources of the information?
Re: Did I misunderstand or is this a bug?
Posted: 28 September 2026, 15:53
by DdotD
From the rulebook "There are ALWAYS 2 testimonies and 1 piece of supporting evidence of the crime motive. But be careful! There are motives with 2 testimonies and 1 piece of supporting evidence that turn out not to be the crime motive"
Re: Did I misunderstand or is this a bug?
Posted: 03 October 2026, 05:09
by ViolentSilence
DdotD wrote: ↑28 September 2026, 15:53
From the rulebook "There are ALWAYS 2 testimonies and 1 piece of supporting evidence of the crime motive. But be careful! There are motives with 2 testimonies and 1 piece of supporting evidence that turn out not to be the crime motive"
I wonder if the game could do with the reminders from the screens in a more prominent place? That point is on there, along with a few other reminders including details about when there is an accomplice. There is also the detail about the police always being accurate that might have helped here