Hi !
I am not sure to understand how the dessert rule actually works on BGA.
I re-read the rules and it says :
I won 6 pnts because I had the most, two players shared the 6pnts penality cause they had few but the one with 0 had 0 penality which is very unfair/unbalanced.
I not sure to understand why and I think it makes the game very unbalanced because not to play any pudding is more interesting than trying to get the most of it and it makes the whole pudding thing a bit absurd.
Thank you for you answer !
I am not sure to understand how the dessert rule actually works on BGA.
I re-read the rules and it says :
Thing is : I played several games and this happened : the player whom had chose not to play any dessert had 0 penality at the end of the game.The player with the fewest pudding cards
(including players with none) loses 6 points.
If multiple players tie for the least, they split the
lost points evenly (ignoring any remainder)
I won 6 pnts because I had the most, two players shared the 6pnts penality cause they had few but the one with 0 had 0 penality which is very unfair/unbalanced.
I not sure to understand why and I think it makes the game very unbalanced because not to play any pudding is more interesting than trying to get the most of it and it makes the whole pudding thing a bit absurd.
Thank you for you answer !