Board Game Arena

The discussion is great thanks all; I wonder if an employee of BGA would post a reply to help us understand the status quo. Perhaps the original poster (OP) should submit a bug report or feature request, those of us interested can upvote it, and see where it goes? I could never afford premium on he...

The discussion is great thanks all; I wonder if an employee of BGA would post a reply to help us understand the status quo. Perhaps the original poster (OP) should submit a bug report or feature request, those of us interested can upvote it, and see where it goes? I could never afford premium on her...

Agreed on the luck based game; which visitors are the most over powered? Love the discussion.

I am not under the delusion Hackers is a good, efficient card in general or in a vacuum... I have played it at times and, at times, when it was an early gen and I had plenty of power, it was even good. . (So I agree with RoyalR).

I upvoted the suggestion \ bug on this thread. I also don't enjoy turn based so a bit more time to start sounds good to me.

I definitely think that the player counts in game matter very much; indeed some amazing cards in 2p are terrible in higher player counts. I have seen the math behind how hackers is not an efficient play; I find it very playable in 2p (especially early gens, with ample power prod) and amazing in some...

Where's Flanders?

I love this community; we are so nice. In other online platforms, this post would have just gotten a 'git gud' reply.

I think the settings are fine, I set mine to wait 5 seconds even if I don't have a nope for these purposes and it seems to work fine. To each their own. BGA allows you to play like this, seems the rules do too.

Corbz makes a great post and polite, logical point as usual. I upvoted the bug report. Let's get some more transparency on BGA. Great work Corbs. Best wishes.