Board Game Arena

DOL_GULDUR wrote: ↑24 August 2026, 16:31 There are so many slow players

Not that I care personally in any way, I only play correspondance. But this made me smile. Hard to take the existance of so many slow players as a good reason for adding ultra short games for the few quick players!

Are humans deterministic?

Meanwhile we've grown to 5 members, so the leaderboards are a tad more interesting now.

Thanks for your comments. Note that this is not a thread for collecting feedback for BGA. This is for stats that I can create for this group. (Be the change you want to see ... :-) ) On another note I already found a good way to publish the data on github, fully automated which means: more likely to...

I'm a stats addict and love leaderboards. For me BGA's Hall of Fame is not enough. So I created a group today for having more different types of leaderboards, but restricted to people in that group. https://boardgamearena.com/group?id=20876666 The boards will be created via getting data from the mem...

Just guessing:

1. much easier
2. quicker to get a game

Not much to interpret there I would argue. The infect cities is a different phase that comes after drawing cards. The rulebook would have to explicitly mention skipping that phase after an epidemic. It doesn't though.

I'm pretty sure with the negative way you ask the question you will have no chance to interpret the results.

To answer it: No, my favorite game is not not on BGA.

The reason behind this was toxic behaviour of players in cooperative games. There are other threads around this. From what I read elsewhere it might have helped a bit, so while certainly sad and not an elegant solution, it may solve something to some degree.

Might depend on circumstances and scenario of course, but if I recall correctly I have mostly taken a somewhat opportunistic approach: I didn't try hard to turn more, but if I had the chance to do so without investing or risking anything, I did.