Wreckage wrote: ↑25 February 2021, 12:36
Actually, my win ratio stays between 98-101.
Sorry about that , my fault again.
I only check the win ratio of <Whatshisbucket> but not yours. His win ratio is only 76% and has almost the same ELO to you, That's why I made a wrong conclusion.
https://boardgamearena.com/report?id=36522&player=89184187 I'm talking about this thread. https://boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=18807 Allright you are right , but it is nothing different, because it is invisible to anybody including myself. Unless somebody get the link from s...
The report is unchanged. I don't know if I misunderstand you. I just want to say: The "guilty record" was really exist in the profile page https://boardgamearena.com/player?id=89184187 and it disappeared before it expires. For the respectation to you, I just check each profile pages of my...
Flora, that player has only played 5 games during the current ELO system. Before that they played with a 25 K factor..... Sorry, my fault. But my main conclusion maybe still holds, because: At least the win ratio is not fake. Even if his opponents have only 200-300 ELO, it is still an outstanding a...
All right everybody listen up , here is a bad news for your majority: Now I have a suitable example to refute Wreckage. Please look at the TOP 10 RANKINGS now. <Chadmild> still has 716 ELO but he is at the 2nd place now. And <Sand73> is at the 1st place now with 731 ELO!!! Then look at his game hist...
After reading the reply of <Chadmild>, I think if <Chadmild> and I live in the same city, we can be good playmates in real life. There are too many commons between us: so i'll tell you i have always played 1 vs 1 game, IRL and on BGA Me too, in real life, it is much easier to find only one valuable ...
This is my first time to use the forum of Board Game Arena. Thanks Wreckage for inviting me to give some comments to this issue. After reading his post, i totally agree with him. I eventually realize that, why some players top the list who get so high ELO are so unfamiliar. I never play with them. ...
That's the only fair way to compare the apples and oranges of 1v1 vs multiplayer. A player who outright wins 4 4p games has done the equivalent feat as a player who has won 12 1v1 games. If we only consider about the difficulty, it is fair, we both beat 12 opponents. But if we also consider about <...
i think to be honest a game of nimmt for 2 players? It might be boring as hell.. and very luck dependent instead of strategy.. but you are right on this point The fact is: It is thought very boring for maybe majority people. But some people including me think it is interesting. very luck dependent?...
Lol, assume they both play the same level of opponent....any level you choose. If they both have victories 75% of the time, the 2p guy will be hundreds ahead of the 5p guy all the way...he's getting 37.5% more ELO for each victory all the way. There are 2 preconditions: One player indeed can keep a...