Re .moderated

Discussions about BGA (all languages)
Forum rules
Warning: challenging a moderation in Forum = 10 days ban
More info & details about how to challenge a moderation: viewtopic.php?p=119756
Locked
User avatar
Yobust
Posts: 159
Joined: 09 December 2020, 14:50

Re .moderated

Post by Yobust »

It look some of us wasting our our times by try to explain things with common sense to bga . By trying to make them understand that they are tough on certain decicions they making by moderating some for exactly nothing . Too Jest Phulin please don't tell me to let bga reply as they already did nd that what am going on a out because telling me I insulted someone where I didn't that time but other player did but bga couldn't in such apologized to me to the attitude that one of they player rudd to me. So if u expect respect give it too
User avatar
ufm
Posts: 2039
Joined: 06 January 2017, 08:38

Re: Re .moderated

Post by ufm »

Freedom of speech does not mean you may freely retaliate. The moderation was fair.
You should have silently redthumbed and reported that user instead of being sarcastic.
User avatar
compte obelète
Posts: 669
Joined: 17 April 2020, 15:25

Re: Re .moderated

Post by compte obelète »

Can I sing in this tread?

We no stranger to moderations
You know the rules, and so do I
And if you complain and it's truly placed
Then say goodbye

BGA gonna give a penalty
BGA gonna let you down
...

I let the others continue the modified song :lol:
User avatar
KongKing123
Posts: 577
Joined: 04 April 2020, 19:43

Re: Re .moderated

Post by KongKing123 »

ufm wrote: 30 November 2021, 15:28 Freedom of speech does not mean you may freely retaliate. The moderation was fair.
You should have silently redthumbed and reported that user instead of being sarcastic.
Disagree, I'm not seeing anything that warrants a moderation there. I would have retaliated just the same, something to the tune of "I'll take as much time as I want".

I wouldn't let people get away with shitty behaviour just because they might feel "insulted" by a totally reasonable (abrasive, but civil) response.
User avatar
Ze Monstah
Posts: 677
Joined: 10 October 2019, 08:08
Location: Brăila, Romania

Re: Re .moderated

Post by Ze Monstah »

As much as I love the site, I also fail to see anything insulting or moderation-worthy in that thing you said you were moderated for, in the previous thread (that got locked) - the stuff written in (...)

I even have issues finding the sarcasm/abrasiveness there, even if you say you tried to be sarcastic (perhaps I can't see it because of the language barrier, or because my sarcasm is usually harsher) :-(

I think there are some people who will always agree on anything a site has to do or say, no matter what ("the Disneyland complex"), but I cannot but AGREE with both you and kongking, on this one.

I hope you do not repeat the experience, and I hope you won't make BGA feel upset enough in order to ban you, for such recurring forum posts.

I would advise you to forget this and to not repeat these forum posts; not because you are wrong (because you are right), but to avoid a bigger danger - getting banned.

Wish you good luck.
When life gives you a ZeMon, make ZeMonade...
https://youtu.be/fq_EAESWlOs
User avatar
xate
Posts: 196
Joined: 16 April 2020, 16:53

Re: Re .moderated

Post by xate »

I am sorry that you disagree with the Moderators warning to you not to reply aggressively.

When you are Moderated, you receive notice of the proper channel to address your concerns and disagreement about the Moderation. The correct format for this is not the Forums, but rather directly to the BGA admins. We do not discuss Moderation reports in public, as this is a breach of privacy.

You have been warned about this before recently. This is your final warning to please use the official channels.
Locked

Return to “Discussions”