Site runs slower than it used to

Discussions about BGA (all languages)
Forum rules
Warning: challenging a moderation in Forum = 10 days ban
More info & details about how to challenge a moderation: viewtopic.php?p=119756
Sheba-leila
Posts: 63
Joined: 15 June 2022, 16:38

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Sheba-leila »

Aus Favoriten entfernen ergibt keinen Sinn. Sie unterhalb auf der selben Seite unter spiele die du kennst.da ändert sich nichts. Und dann noch riesige Bilder spiele die ich dir empfehle. Total unnütz. Ich bin in der Lage mir spiele zu suchen die ich spielen möchte. Und bei der spiele seite seit über einen jahr wird da rumgespielt. Warum muss das sein .war vorher okay. Sind die Menschen nicht mehr in der Lage selbst ein Spiel auszusuchen. Für mich ist das kindergartenkram. Aber gut wenn es soviel gibt die ohne Vorgabe kein Spiel finden. Bin ich froh das ich schon alt bin.
User avatar
Meeplelowda
Posts: 3832
Joined: 14 March 2020, 10:31

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Meeplelowda »

After doing a bit of poking around, it seems that whenever there is a delay completing the page load (of the Play Now page) it occurs when there is a long pause (long in Internet terms, as in 12 to 15 seconds) after this resource is requested:
/halloffame/halloffame/getDailyTables.html?dojo.preventCache=1666131756963

To clarify, I don't mean that the assets that are loaded after getDailyTables.html is requested take 12 to 15 seconds. Those assets are mainly the thumbnail png files for the games and each one loads on the order of 10ms to a couple hundred ms if read from disk cache, and on the order of microseconds if read from memory cache. I mean that there is a delay before the thumbnail assets are even requested. So even though the thumbnails may take 7 seconds to load, that is in addition to, not a part of, the delay before they are even requested.

For example, in the last waterfall I captured, getDailyTables.html was queued at 6.75 seconds after the page reload, but the first thumbnail asset (for Wingspan :D https://x.boardgamearena.net/data/gamem ... =165165215) was not queued until 15.68 seconds after page reload. Although in that case it was "only" a 9 second delay between getDailyTables.html being requested and the thumbnails starting to load, in prior tests the first thumbnail asset wasn't queued until 12 to 15 seconds after getDailyTables.html is requested.

The takeaway is that when the page stalls it is not the loading of the thumbnail assets that is the major contributor to the delay.
Last edited by Meeplelowda on 18 October 2022, 23:55, edited 1 time in total.
Play Now lobby 4ever! https://boardgamearena.com/lobby
User avatar
Silaxe
Posts: 38
Joined: 16 November 2020, 17:51

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Silaxe »

Même chose pour moi.

Mais puisque on risque un bannissement si on se plaint, je dirais que le site fonctionne très très bien, un vrai plaisir :lol:

Entre ces problèmes, et les autres dont je ne parlerai évidemment pas pour les mêmes raisons, j'attends de terminer mes parties en tour par tour (histoire de ne pas pénaliser les autres joueurs), et je supprime définitivement mon compte.
Sheba-leila
Posts: 63
Joined: 15 June 2022, 16:38

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Sheba-leila »

Es liegt an den spiele. Bei etwa 100 verschiedenen ging es los. Ich habe jetzt über200 und es ist grauenhaft. Auf spiele wird seit über 1 Jahr herumgebastelt. Es wird für mich immer unübersichtlicher und total unnütz. Wie es vorher war reichte vollkommen. Wenn das alles ist was sie seit sie BGA übernommen haben zur angeblichen Verbesserung beigetragen haben . Für mich wird es nur immer unsinniger
User avatar
Een
Posts: 3861
Joined: 16 June 2010, 19:52

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Een »

This change included in the latest release should help: viewtopic.php?p=125751#p125751
It shaved off 13 seconds from the play now page load time for me.
User avatar
Jellby
Posts: 3545
Joined: 31 December 2013, 12:22

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Jellby »

Much better. But I would have preferred an option to still show the full list (not just a link to games page) or turn off completely that section.
Sheba-leila
Posts: 63
Joined: 15 June 2022, 16:38

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Sheba-leila »

Ich hab mir jetzt dir Mühe gemacht alle Spiele auszuprobieren. Danach kam eine Fehlermeldung und jetzt sind wieder alle unter Favoriten. Seit 2 Jahren basteln sie jetzt an der Seite rum. Ergebnis es wird immer schlimmer statt besser. Sie können mir ja eine Mail schreiben wenn es wieder funktioniert.
Snowcrash000
Posts: 60
Joined: 10 September 2022, 00:15

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Snowcrash000 »

Een wrote: 08 November 2022, 11:27 This change included in the latest release should help: viewtopic.php?p=125751#p125751
It shaved off 13 seconds from the play now page load time for me.
It would have been nice if this had been implemented in such a way that the games that are lowest in your list get droppped. Instead, some of my favorite and most played games just randomly dropped out of the list, which is incredibly annoying, to be honest. Really not well-implemented at all.
User avatar
Een
Posts: 3861
Joined: 16 June 2010, 19:52

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by Een »

Snowcrash000 wrote: 09 November 2022, 12:30 It would have been nice if this had been implemented in such a way that the games that are lowest in your list get droppped. Instead, some of my favorite and most played games just randomly dropped out of the list, which is incredibly annoying, to be honest. Really not well-implemented at all.
Those are meant to be in the "favorite games" list since they are just that. Sorry if the "other games you know" was a better fit for you, but this section had become really too heavy to be kept "as is". This page has been implemented at a time were the number of games was much lower (and work is ongoing to modernize it cf viewtopic.php?t=26789).
User avatar
dgjxqz
Posts: 68
Joined: 07 February 2021, 22:45

Re: Site runs slower than it used to

Post by dgjxqz »

I certainly prefer hiding least recently played games instead of some algorithm based on the popularity of the games. It gives users certain control over what they want to hide. That's how you sort the games when displaying anyway.
Post Reply

Return to “Discussions”