Logarythm in Numbers

[Céline-M]

From my point of few this game is really badly programmed.
Often the game is not balanced.
As solutions, the logic rhythm should be improved to make the game fairer:
- Starting round: Players should be given similarly fair numbers, not someone 1-20 and the other 9-13
- The probability of new tiles should be taken into account
- It would be nice if the logarithm also took into account the strength of the game: lower players have it a little easier than stronger players

[nccc]

This is a luck based game,so it can't be "fairer".
And no house rules,unless u can convince developer to change the rules.
For ur last point, it's impossible, they're already players complaining the game is biased.
If u really implement that, higher elo player WILL ragequit lol.

[Céline-M]

It can be fairer, but that requires more commitment from the developers to make the game more meaningful.


Nice example: opponent has numbers between 3-19 at the start, and I have 11-15. I think this can be done better on the programmers' side otherwise there is a big disadvantage right from the start, especially if there are no lower numbers for me for 6 rounds.

With a simple logic rhythm this can be improved and the game will also be better.

[Jellby]

What is logic rhythm?

What logarythm?

(Yes, I know.)

[nccc]

If u want "fair" by manipulating luck, just go play chess.
Or balatro, or bingle bingle.

[nccc]

The game would be extremely boring if it's really fair.
Because first player will always win.

[zoomboom]

It can be fairer, but that requires more commitment from the developers to make the game more meaningful.


Nice example: opponent has numbers between 3-19 at the start, and I have 11-15. I think this can be done better on the programmers' side otherwise there is a big disadvantage right from the start, especially if there are no lower numbers for me for 6 rounds.

With a simple logic rhythm this can be improved and the game will also be better.

I think what you mean to say is "algorithm", instead of "logic rhythm".

[Meeplelowda]

It can be fairer, but that requires more commitment from the developers to make the game more meaningful.


Nice example: opponent has numbers between 3-19 at the start, and I have 11-15. I think this can be done better on the programmers' side otherwise there is a big disadvantage right from the start, especially if there are no lower numbers for me for 6 rounds.

With a simple logic rhythm this can be improved and the game will also be better.

I think what you mean to say is "algorithm", instead of "logic rhythm".

I like logic rhythm. It sounds like a new game combining boolean algebra with Beat Saber.

[Silene]

I like logic rhythm. It sounds like a new game combining boolean algebra with Beat Saber.

I would definitely play this!

[Guudys]

How is it fairer if you make the game easier for lower ELO players? A fair game should have all players equal, regardless of ranking.

Also the game is called Lucky Numbers, like it's literally in the name. I don't understand the point in wanting to change the game when its main aspect is that there's luck involved, it's in the name of the game itself...