Why can't we vote on changes?

Forum rules
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/#!bugs
User avatar
ufm
Posts: 2039
Joined: 06 January 2017, 08:38

Re: Why can't we vote on changes?

Post by ufm »

Jellby wrote: 02 November 2024, 13:14 The publisher may request something, or revoke the license, or find another developer...
That summarizes everything: https://boardgamearena.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=140849
Many publishers don't look a gift horse from voluntary devs in the mouth, if the implementation is acceptable enough.
However, some publishers want to maintain quality standards, especially when they hire freelancers.
Also, plenty of publishers intentionally exclude expansions and/or variants even if the developers are willing to add them.

Anyway, no more thread derailing. This whole 'all losers' stuff has been rejected every time and it will not be changed. Period.
Waugapapa
Posts: 12
Joined: 04 January 2024, 05:10

Re: Why can't we vote on changes?

Post by Waugapapa »

*Moderator: Post removed for aggressive words towards the valued developer. Please be respectful in your communication on BGA or we reserve the right to remove your ability to do so. If you are unhappy with the BGA implementation of Hearts, we kindly invite you to stop playing it.
User avatar
ReblScum
Posts: 20
Joined: 08 December 2020, 23:39

Re: Why can't we vote on changes?

Post by ReblScum »

Can we please try a different approach altogether?

Why not allow players to have more control over the speed requirements?

Some players clearly enjoy taking enough time before throwing their cards to review every book played previously.

But many of us consider that cheating.

Yet we have no way to indicate which version we want to play, or to enforce table wishes.

It is very frustrating.
FrankJones
Posts: 2440
Joined: 30 June 2024, 00:24

Re: Why can't we vote on changes?

Post by FrankJones »

ReblScum wrote: 14 September 2025, 01:46 Can we please try a different approach altogether?

Why not allow players to have more control over the speed requirements?

Some players clearly enjoy taking enough time before throwing their cards to review every book played previously.

But many of us consider that cheating.

Yet we have no way to indicate which version we want to play, or to enforce table wishes.

It is very frustrating.
I like to at least be able to see and mentally process the cards played. At the blazing pace of the game, I can barely do so. And, I like to see my receives passed cards and strategize for a moment before it's suddenly the last card of trick 2 because I was passed the 2 of clubs, which auto-played,
was taken by the player to my left, who then immediately led a card to me in 4th seat.
User avatar
ReblScum
Posts: 20
Joined: 08 December 2020, 23:39

Re: Why can't we vote on changes?

Post by ReblScum »

That's fine! @frankjones

What you like isn't in opposition to what I'm asking for.

I'm asking that people be allowed to set their own speed preferences.

There's so little variation in the choices now that the only folks who seem to care are people whose connections are poor (who need slower games) and people like me whose attention span is poor (who need faster games).
Post Reply

Return to “Hearts”