Just had a game ended because it didn't finish prior to the next round of a tournament. I was way ahead in the game, but because someone else had more "thinking time" remaining, they got the win.
Are theses rules set by the tournament, each game, or BGA?
Some games where there is no winner until it's over that makes sense. But for a game like "Welcome To..." where scores are maintained throughout the game, that ending condition doesn't result in a fair outcome. Sure a player cannot make quick moves and be losing on the hopes that time will expire... but it seems silly to have this "one size fits a few" policy ruin games for everyone.
Just wondering how this is decided.
Are theses rules set by the tournament, each game, or BGA?
Some games where there is no winner until it's over that makes sense. But for a game like "Welcome To..." where scores are maintained throughout the game, that ending condition doesn't result in a fair outcome. Sure a player cannot make quick moves and be losing on the hopes that time will expire... but it seems silly to have this "one size fits a few" policy ruin games for everyone.
Just wondering how this is decided.