Asteroid Mining Consortium

Forum rules
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/bugs
FrankJones
Posts: 2447
Joined: 30 June 2024, 00:24

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by FrankJones »

I count the final score as 111-107 in favor of Corvus, if the game were played out.
User avatar
xspuipuke
Posts: 221
Joined: 13 July 2021, 16:51

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by xspuipuke »

Oh, that‘s rough. Sorry for my post then.
User avatar
RoyalRook
Posts: 389
Joined: 29 March 2024, 02:25

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by RoyalRook »

FrankJones wrote: 02 July 2025, 17:41 I count the final score as 111-107 in favor of Corvus, if the game were played out.
Yeah I remember it was something interesting, I would always gave my opponent a chance to play it out, bc it doesn't do anything to kick in 2p turn based.
User avatar
Corvus Mortis
Posts: 59
Joined: 16 May 2024, 18:30

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by Corvus Mortis »

RoyalRook wrote: 02 July 2025, 15:50 I am not saying I won, there are plenty of games I came from behind 20 points down. He doesn't know he won for sure. I would not and never kick a player like that in a 2p turn based, imagine I did that and kick him while ahead.
I know for sure I would have won.
User avatar
RoyalRook
Posts: 389
Joined: 29 March 2024, 02:25

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by RoyalRook »

Corvus Mortis wrote: 02 July 2025, 21:50
RoyalRook wrote: 02 July 2025, 15:50 I am not saying I won, there are plenty of games I came from behind 20 points down. He doesn't know he won for sure. I would not and never kick a player like that in a 2p turn based, imagine I did that and kick him while ahead.
I know for sure I would have won.
Ggwp, let's do multiple turn basedd at the same time, unless it's a complete game you can not say for sure in my opinion bc the cards are blind.
User avatar
Kulikk
Posts: 74
Joined: 05 April 2024, 17:32

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by Kulikk »

It was about as winning as it gets
User avatar
Corvus Mortis
Posts: 59
Joined: 16 May 2024, 18:30

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by Corvus Mortis »

FrankJones wrote: 02 July 2025, 17:41 I count the final score as 111-107 in favor of Corvus, if the game were played out.
I booted RR when I had 101 points. My sequence is:

- Protected Valley +2 points
- Convert 2 plants +2 points
- LHT to Fish +2 points
- Greenhouses +1 point on Decomposers
- Convert +2 points
- Take Fish +1 point
- Take Small Animal +1 point
- Take Livestock +1 point
- Final conversion +2 points

That's 115 points, not 111 (plus I get another point below).

Rook was booted with 91 VP and 57 MC. His best line is:

- Ecosystems, 47 MC +4 points
- Mangrove, 37 MC + 4 points (but it gives me 1 point)
- Power Infra, 47 MC
- Sell 4 cards, 51 MC
- SP Greenery, +3 points
- SP Greenery, +2 points
- Final conversion, +3 points

So the final score is 116-107. Not particularly close.
User avatar
Corvus Mortis
Posts: 59
Joined: 16 May 2024, 18:30

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by Corvus Mortis »

RoyalRook wrote: 02 July 2025, 21:55
Corvus Mortis wrote: 02 July 2025, 21:50
RoyalRook wrote: 02 July 2025, 15:50 I am not saying I won, there are plenty of games I came from behind 20 points down. He doesn't know he won for sure. I would not and never kick a player like that in a 2p turn based, imagine I did that and kick him while ahead.
I know for sure I would have won.
Ggwp, let's do multiple turn basedd at the same time, unless it's a complete game you can not say for sure in my opinion bc the cards are blind.
The cards are not blind, I can look up what you had and straight up calculate the best line (see above).
User avatar
Corvus Mortis
Posts: 59
Joined: 16 May 2024, 18:30

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by Corvus Mortis »

RoyalRook wrote: 02 July 2025, 21:47
FrankJones wrote: 02 July 2025, 17:41 I count the final score as 111-107 in favor of Corvus, if the game were played out.
Yeah I remember it was something interesting, I would always gave my opponent a chance to play it out, bc it doesn't do anything to kick in 2p turn based.
You were playing other Arena games and not progressing on our game from a totally lost position. You started being kicked from other games and your Elo was plummeting. Based on your inactivity, I could tell that you would be losing far more (which you did). I knew my position was won and don't think it's fair for me to not get the Elo because you're being kicked out of other games. I'll play you again once you acknowledge that you were in a lost position and there is no ambiguity.
FrankJones
Posts: 2447
Joined: 30 June 2024, 00:24

Re: Asteroid Mining Consortium

Post by FrankJones »

Corvus Mortis wrote: 02 July 2025, 22:07
FrankJones wrote: 02 July 2025, 17:41 I count the final score as 111-107 in favor of Corvus, if the game were played out.
I booted RR when I had 101 points. My sequence is:

- Protected Valley +2 points
- Convert 2 plants +2 points
- LHT to Fish +2 points
- Greenhouses +1 point on Decomposers
- Convert +2 points
- Take Fish +1 point
- Take Small Animal +1 point
- Take Livestock +1 point
- Final conversion +2 points

That's 115 points, not 111 (plus I get another point below).

Rook was booted with 91 VP and 57 MC. His best line is:

- Ecosystems, 47 MC +4 points
- Mangrove, 37 MC + 4 points (but it gives me 1 point)
- Power Infra, 47 MC
- Sell 4 cards, 51 MC
- SP Greenery, +3 points
- SP Greenery, +2 points
- Final conversion, +3 points

So the final score is 116-107. Not particularly close.
Whoops. I forgot to add your point for decomposers, and I forgot to look at your blue action cards, which give 3 more points; that is how I came up with 111 instead of the correct 115.

Rook has a sequence that gets him to 107 without needing to put Mangrove next to your city; so, the "official" final score with both players playing optimally would be 115-107.
Post Reply

Return to “Terraforming Mars”