TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Forum rules
Please DO NOT POST BUGS on this forum. Please report (and vote) bugs on : https://boardgamearena.com/bugs
FrankJones
Posts: 2447
Joined: 30 June 2024, 00:24

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by FrankJones »

Inevntrix + biolabs can be a fun start. The last time I had that, it crashed and burned and I lost by 35+ points.

In this game, after taking the mandatory 3 card draw, Inventrix has:

AI Central
restricted area
media group
business network
Sabotage
Investment Loan
sponsors
Inventor's Guild
sponsors
Heat Trappers
Interstellar Colony ship

and 3 likely discards.

Not too shabby!
User avatar
Amaanda23
Posts: 1
Joined: 05 July 2023, 19:56

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by Amaanda23 »

discordo totalmente de você. acredito que seja extremamente competitivo quando jogamos apenas eu e minha esposa. talvez você não tenha tido sorte.
User avatar
RoyalRook
Posts: 389
Joined: 29 March 2024, 02:25

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by RoyalRook »

HappyMeaI wrote: 21 August 2025, 19:54
Bogeyun wrote: 21 August 2025, 15:30
HappyMeaI wrote: 21 August 2025, 10:15

Lol yeah I forget why I took ghg over mass. That was a massive blunder. The first 2 gens were played perfectly, but I could actually see an argument for playing Immigrant city mid right w aquifer pumping to place the oceans and get rebates—easier capture on gardener—but +16-17 income gen 1 is pretty much the cream. Also I forget why I SPd greenery in gen 3. Think I was going to take gardener / terraformer / builder but wasn’t paying attention to his science and he took planner. Probably why I passed mass gen also. Regardless, that game was unwinnable I believe.
Perfectly? You skip bushes and trees. Comet with pumping is not worth buying. I love pumping as a card but don't think it was a good game for it - you play the card entirely with cash gen 1. Power gens looks better than supply drop although with pumping the supply drop is a bit better. Playing Immi City gen 1 isn't worth it. You buy TG in opener. You skip EOS in gen 2 draft w/ viral in hand as MG. You pick PI over biomass. We're not even at gen 3 yet 😅
I had a better response typed out but lost it, so I’ll do a quicker one.


That was a nutty open for MG. Why take a card like trees / bushes with no HP in hand? Why not play IMM gen 1 with pp in hand as MG? I could see arguing for bushes over tfg with the city in hand, and I don’t mind power generation either. I mathed it out exactly so I could do everything I did and buy 1 extra card. I got sabbed and still ended with 15 income. Not sure how choosing PI over Biomass would matter. Do ppl actually play biomass in the 800s?

I like Aquifer there and I hate that card more than anything. It’s such an economic spew 9/10 times, but it felt kosher there.

Did you finish the game? I’m curious if you think it was winnable. Also let’s play a few non-ranked games. I want to be regaled.
Why would you be so disrespectful and entitled while only want to play non-ranked? At this point, you are just wasting top player's time. You are a troll, let's not feed trolls. You ask me a game before but ended up being a non ranked, you don't learn anything and doing same thing again over and over once more here. It's pure comical at this point, what a good joke.
User avatar
HappyMeaI
Posts: 81
Joined: 15 April 2024, 21:21

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by HappyMeaI »

RoyalRook wrote: 22 August 2025, 18:57
HappyMeaI wrote: 21 August 2025, 19:54
Bogeyun wrote: 21 August 2025, 15:30

Perfectly? You skip bushes and trees. Comet with pumping is not worth buying. I love pumping as a card but don't think it was a good game for it - you play the card entirely with cash gen 1. Power gens looks better than supply drop although with pumping the supply drop is a bit better. Playing Immi City gen 1 isn't worth it. You buy TG in opener. You skip EOS in gen 2 draft w/ viral in hand as MG. You pick PI over biomass. We're not even at gen 3 yet 😅
I had a better response typed out but lost it, so I’ll do a quicker one.


That was a nutty open for MG. Why take a card like trees / bushes with no HP in hand? Why not play IMM gen 1 with pp in hand as MG? I could see arguing for bushes over tfg with the city in hand, and I don’t mind power generation either. I mathed it out exactly so I could do everything I did and buy 1 extra card. I got sabbed and still ended with 15 income. Not sure how choosing PI over Biomass would matter. Do ppl actually play biomass in the 800s?

I like Aquifer there and I hate that card more than anything. It’s such an economic spew 9/10 times, but it felt kosher there.

Did you finish the game? I’m curious if you think it was winnable. Also let’s play a few non-ranked games. I want to be regaled.
Why would you be so disrespectful and entitled while only want to play non-ranked? At this point, you are just wasting top player's time. You are a troll, let's not feed trolls. You ask me a game before but ended up being a non ranked, you don't learn anything and doing same thing again over and over once more here. It's pure comical at this point, what a good joke.
Not sure the value this adds to the thread. You think playing ranked makes a difference? Also, he’s more likely to play me if he knows I can’t tank his elo.

I’d ofc happily play ranked if he wanted, and, if you’d like… I’d also play ranked with you (we’re due for another 9 games).?

AI won’t come home to save you every game Rook!

P.S. Rook - Why do you care so much about elo and your appeal to a handful of internet forumers?
User avatar
RoyalRook
Posts: 389
Joined: 29 March 2024, 02:25

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by RoyalRook »

See? Don't feed the troll, let him troll.
User avatar
Attica451
Posts: 18
Joined: 21 April 2024, 17:08

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by Attica451 »

Hes not trolling hes just stubborn and argumentative sometimes. I really wouldnt put much stock into these nonranked games me and him have. We both try stuff for fun and talk trash the entire time. I play while at work and he plays while hes in between making decisions at the poker table. Just pointing out we arent 100% focused on the game at the time we play.
FrankJones
Posts: 2447
Joined: 30 June 2024, 00:24

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by FrankJones »

What's wrong with playing non-ranked?

If a person is a saying, "I believe my true skill level is 700, but my actual Elo is 550", wouldn't a 700+ Elo player prefer to play that game non-ranked?
R-Cane
Posts: 14
Joined: 15 February 2025, 19:25

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by R-Cane »

Kulikk wrote: 10 July 2025, 07:09 On the other note, you are extremely overrating ai, it's not even close to being one of the best cards
My ELO isn`t super high, and I play 2 player games exclusivly. And I would say that in base game, AI (if you can play it early) is defenitivly one of the best (10?!)cards you can get. The only things that would let me think twice about picking it would be -2 cost cards and jovian multipiers, (and to some extend nitrogen- rich asteroid and large convoi)
primrose1234
Posts: 108
Joined: 01 February 2025, 20:03

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by primrose1234 »

We should discuss Jovians and Mars University, I believe. Surely they didn't get mentioned in this thread so far.
User avatar
Kulikk
Posts: 74
Joined: 05 April 2024, 17:32

Re: TM is not a best 2Players game :( (nt)

Post by Kulikk »

R-Cane wrote: 29 August 2025, 15:08
Kulikk wrote: 10 July 2025, 07:09 On the other note, you are extremely overrating ai, it's not even close to being one of the best cards
My ELO isn`t super high, and I play 2 player games exclusivly. And I would say that in base game, AI (if you can play it early) is defenitivly one of the best (10?!)cards you can get. The only things that would let me think twice about picking it would be -2 cost cards and jovian multipiers, (and to some extend nitrogen- rich asteroid and large convoi)
Since base games are longer it's likely that you'll have AI active for more generations making it better. Jovians are just bad though :P
Post Reply

Return to “Terraforming Mars”